From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D659C433FE for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A68610FB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237919AbhJFJvN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 05:51:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56912 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237825AbhJFJvM (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 05:51:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A04C061749; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id r10so6945758wra.12; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MsuQtEChoXXsQ8RTArm2X9b2oKTiPMrHWJ1ndi5wCrs=; b=fskZcF1nx08cvXD6AI60wKP2ls/YzpKVOP6d0ZFPxqT0V/XsSwhkjGqMUIjFgfCT5n 3DAoskUkv2farToUXHn2jZ85ijkdtGXMmxHPwTe77PUJlNBZet+tesyE0q5Qad4IBOwl lRFr6Tj0daEoBdNw72DlJZztgieCIT4R6XiSVuP2M+Mngarm6auAyb9qlAirU9ZVPaRy APYYAFsQyLtSx7QHXVWdwlOJ46qaUpIyO4Sd5DZoarIBNq6CFfS2+9+23nLcKZoVbZG5 F2RJldYO1Ki5Q0j2w+LDYCUrq4TbLrunY3yiHmS6IdAYmzTLY/iYTVZzx1VrSUrmSnjj kXDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MsuQtEChoXXsQ8RTArm2X9b2oKTiPMrHWJ1ndi5wCrs=; b=zZJpl6R2VBLdDq2QaXiXnLZgVV12aa+XHAkYpgcBKPH0dAaomzVwyi/7AVPvA+74BD dV1BcRLGTq56/qTvtGU2WA4OmMRlfRL4AJYLAXjnBi71VKT6vRnBQY6eh9whFBEUnGz0 l1r1eMOjDCbx6q3CjSYt4UMghrb42CQKdX973N3HAsZHYcyajapBVv2hJd/+8+BH0CSs yP1934Ir+MmvwLaDviLKi7mbqUlNdxJiTNKuy0JYJkQs2Z+XaJOLn/rs+IrbffqR5dEv U+tt8bB5zkvuOdzTMeQIOFMTjDgebe4RvonF+r11ilv0wPFVNeDzN32rTQaQ9KCptknb vTjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533820iI6asNrlQCCkConzYTVMtWrNtSlyyJT9FLZNI1VpRSYSUP VoY34oEHEGdWJJxMVjXNvb90EvSX8mo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaNw0csQ74NHWdx7a7mvZ7GbjmCDGS+FUSlAvDcTkFolgbc2qxJBhwWmZjM93y4jyQG1OurA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5234:: with SMTP id i20mr27970917wra.415.1633513758172; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm20348340wru.2.2021.10.06.02.49.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:49:15 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/95] 4.19.209-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211005083300.523409586@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211005083300.523409586@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:38:15AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.209 release. > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:32:44 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/228 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip