From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, jens.wiklander@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH backport for 5.4] tee: optee: Fix missing devices unregister during optee_remove
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:34:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXAM1xA86BWW6jKu@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019094532.470845-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 03:15:32PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> upstream commit 7f565d0ead26
>
> When OP-TEE driver is built as a module, OP-TEE client devices
> registered on TEE bus during probe should be unregistered during
> optee_remove. So implement optee_unregister_devices() accordingly.
>
> Fixes: c3fa24af9244 ("tee: optee: add TEE bus device enumeration support")
> Reported-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> [SG: backport to 5.4, dev name s/optee-ta/optee-clnt/]
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 +++
> drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
Doesn't this also need to go into 5.10 and 5.14? We can not have people
upgrading and having regressions.
Can you provide backports for those trees too? I can not take just this
one, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-19 9:45 [PATCH backport for 5.4] tee: optee: Fix missing devices unregister during optee_remove Sumit Garg
2021-10-20 12:34 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-10-20 12:37 ` Greg KH
2021-10-20 12:38 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXAM1xA86BWW6jKu@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox