From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6331C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243787AbhLFNIH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:08:07 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]:57376 "EHLO ams.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243759AbhLFNIG (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:08:06 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A008B810A9 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B64BCC341C1; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:04:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1638795875; bh=NUSiVGSOX/Gjrz6o2BTwAEoia4KORjAG0nnFsCCpYB0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YLXD1dOlR/mb6HCcNCft8NGBHJ3BzLu5kpVY5SEvd+DBfcdN9TauI0+wAI35VGoCm PUKYZT0iuwsWel9olujWIItWlIRju1cInCIVmLRYKUwYPjEPphV2/Inid9KF26zng9 2K36vKoJfaOVn2XCV+ygFCBtvh+XOd1V8ZQWtqmw= Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:04:32 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Lindroth Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org Subject: Re: Could the fix for broken gcc-plugins with gcc-11 be backported to 5.10? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Lindroth wrote: > Build support for gcc-plugins are not detected with gcc-11 in lts kernels. > Gentoo and Arch apply their own patch to fix the problem in their distribution > kernels but I would prefer if a proper fix was applied upstream. > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/814200 a gentoo report with the relevant info. > > I've searched for any upstream discussions about the problem but I've only found > one message saying the backport needs an additional fix. That was almost a year > ago. https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg438000.html We can not take a patch in a stable kernel release unless it is already in Linus's tree. Please work to get a patch accepted there first, before worrying about older kernel versions. thanks, greg k-h