From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Yi Zhuang <zhuangyi1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: quota: fix potential deadlock
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:18:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdRJEBhSg8vlD6cP@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104130513.3077-1-chao@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 09:05:13PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> commit a5c0042200b28fff3bde6fa128ddeaef97990f8d upstream.
>
> As Yi Zhuang reported in bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214299
>
> There is potential deadlock during quota data flush as below:
>
> Thread A: Thread B:
> f2fs_dquot_acquire
> down_read(&sbi->quota_sem)
> f2fs_write_checkpoint
> block_operations
> f2fs_look_all
> down_write(&sbi->cp_rwsem)
> f2fs_quota_write
> f2fs_write_begin
> __do_map_lock
> f2fs_lock_op
> down_read(&sbi->cp_rwsem)
> __need_flush_qutoa
> down_write(&sbi->quota_sem)
>
> This patch changes block_operations() to use trylock, if it fails,
> it means there is potential quota data updater, in this condition,
> let's flush quota data first and then trylock again to check dirty
> status of quota data.
>
> The side effect is: in heavy race condition (e.g. multi quota data
> upaters vs quota data flusher), it may decrease the probability of
> synchronizing quota data successfully in checkpoint() due to limited
> retry time of quota flush.
>
> Fixes: db6ec53b7e03 ("f2fs: add a rw_sem to cover quota flag changes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.3+
> Reported-by: Yi Zhuang <zhuangyi1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 83e9bc0f91ff..7b0282724231 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,8 @@ static bool __need_flush_quota(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> if (!is_journalled_quota(sbi))
> return false;
>
> - down_write(&sbi->quota_sem);
> + if (!down_write_trylock(&sbi->quota_sem))
> + return true;
> if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH)) {
> ret = false;
> } else if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR)) {
> --
> 2.32.0
>
What stable tree(s) is this for?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-04 13:05 [PATCH] f2fs: quota: fix potential deadlock Chao Yu
2022-01-04 13:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-01-04 15:05 ` Chao Yu
2022-01-04 15:17 ` Greg KH
2022-01-04 15:48 ` Chao Yu
2022-01-05 15:01 ` Greg KH
2022-01-05 15:25 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdRJEBhSg8vlD6cP@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhuangyi1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).