From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED039C433F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 22:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350902AbiBDWzu (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:55:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33134 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243759AbiBDWzu (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:55:50 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59696C061354 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id m9so10178617oia.12 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 14:55:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxtx.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lYzVe5193qn8COmgg7fpEZ/q4OPCD4XcodMJr96TYww=; b=gjgQO2f9qIpYD3Bjd72bgOKUZO/uN5+Xa/kUtlUNC6j73fRBDycuStIjX4URSYdw9t g1P9/agrVthOq8PD9jKOdiTHvPH6HzMwEzXW1CC0SszmIyr4lwTfgkmg5PPwmO15ZoZY TEES0S7p9Kht0RadfXMfydtz4JoKga1XPyXXI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lYzVe5193qn8COmgg7fpEZ/q4OPCD4XcodMJr96TYww=; b=iVHV+KTz5t7AiTDtBmIkT0LnjTal15Kf3fM429eJrDVHDvjD3A9OsVAHjjYXmfPBNR asZBhN40mjamj8JDjuL/cNTNxhYqckIg0ZB9P/kfKegDSkTxI8fzLyIYQm6NQcj8/gNb 8UkU65kPZwGvt+MtY0CuxAPSqCVB3FGA8YUfNs2ejfGpsh5b4fnDSHDBF50Vi79oy18a xuBReddmH/BqrhmLYYRRq3Fb9tC3gQSDsRcRXPEE74OmOkBsijhswqDI/tRnd0O74kA2 mVFSyhM8Q0x8TortWkWYmancgCmu0zJBGKxPZyU2HF1o/YmjHjEf2CIuYAIdTsyFNnsH titg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GhXB1b6hF/l0480iJR5l/NhGv244VThebNuk6OEItRGQLRL5N //yebQtT3T+lXFjlsJtaG+w3Fg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymPvUu/qD68FpoKjiJxlky7nwkfLz/KZeSyYusKniBG6V0DKE2jLTPexRUby7viQBzmR7dEw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:159e:: with SMTP id t30mr620412oiw.132.1644015348581; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 14:55:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora64.linuxtx.org (104-189-158-32.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net. [104.189.158.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26sm1348221oiy.16.2022.02.04.14.55.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 14:55:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:55:46 -0600 From: Justin Forbes To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 00/43] 5.16.6-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220204091917.166033635@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220204091917.166033635@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:07AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.6 release. > There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.6-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted. Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes