From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65C2C2BA4C for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233231AbiAZLPY (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:15:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40926 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233058AbiAZLPX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:15:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A80CC06161C; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id bg19-20020a05600c3c9300b0034565e837b6so1738187wmb.1; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:15:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oB7FvwEDFZDYVoBTpjTDMOC2SfRcobTBo9kJ8jQPmFM=; b=CxIHtBk+wzjvbXKgbhMCy7NLEBTib9WOzw6VChUGhAKwfw703ez0MxwW16T9bA2IBb mwCQVGdyjHeh31kosKas6NvmuOmrNaguE+yucG+q3VFs18vVn+PLnTKxEV4FC00SA2sY w4uzq534gJwaNT64GsK0DBLwG8fLRphp7JStRFsB+EbEdHmqaSdAqMhK5e9ycvhIq1sH SaencuqF3Dqc1HHhVCrmnqMhwKFsW2Md7R7cKxHXl8R+gOh8WNF+AnlzDHhMSdvqwfnQ kKhX1hyWl9RcW/DnZTvXVezaKbLNiqG26zobjPKIxAaI5Vm4rpamWT/CDcYsVsWH5z1W YAyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oB7FvwEDFZDYVoBTpjTDMOC2SfRcobTBo9kJ8jQPmFM=; b=JBo2wh5WMCwqbF2LQwuosIFJM1hGfUvxYltTBnNPsaKCTg8lYJ+wm8holeFVTR2rIN 8vuV1fA6oRNCQ2sq+l/DT+dDN4qVAjwRaS3wM9XeeIwpokv9M8WgGPb9ErVbgNBQBA+6 gAxdleFobjKDGTUP04jotDJ5hqQ2Q0kFPN5K16xZjkoXDWVZuw+KZ5qHkHZP0j+ji42c 9Lk58o2SiSAZZkWD4SUCHsQr6oWTplD+ZF1dvP1jQ+JI0EKaxItumRsYWrSd7nI7sZxI sX5U1vj9qEeo8R/kb1G24IUUJF4Td/58bPZQa/uDTs+6sf8Qt8BCbYHs9FQWxox3c+nT LmtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KbXDp6YaMfUZVutCZ1kH4PL/qVh5F1PfFITMFNmuXNVDaRMik IP7lsDs3VBFC9E+R1xF9MDE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlDXoYojJ2h1CdPBU27ox3UHLvF0CYepnQx0Np+CfzFMiwW5LrjjrS+k9Me7GwlRm7YnOG8g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c04b:: with SMTP id u11mr7176852wmc.104.1643195721517; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm19610238wre.83.2022.01.26.03.15.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:15:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:15:19 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/316] 5.4.174-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220125155315.237374794@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220125155315.237374794@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:32:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.174 release. > There are 316 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/656 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip