stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: "Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	a.zummo@towertech.it, tglx@linutronix.de, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rtc: mc146818-lib: fix RTC presence check" failed to apply to 5.16-stable tree
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:56:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfFS9PFhQYssAAMj@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23a5748e-55ca-69af-c9ff-d68a413a331d@o2.pl>

On 24/01/2022 17:27:16+0100, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
> W dniu 24.01.2022 o 15:52, Greg KH pisze:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:45:30PM +0100, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
> >> W dniu 24.01.2022 o 14:08, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org pisze:
> >>> The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree.
> >>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> >>> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> >>> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >> Wait, this patch was not intended for submission into stable yet, at least not in this form.
> >> Why did it end up in the stable queue?
> > Because it was marked with a "Fixes:" tag and I reviewed it and it
> > looked like it actually fixed an issue.
> >
> > Is this not the case?
> 
> Yes, that's correct. But I'm afraid that this patch will cause regressions on some systems.
> (Mr Alexandre Belloni said something similar of my series). So I'd like to wait till at least Linux 5.17 (final) is
> released to see if it causes any trouble.
> 

Well, it will be in 5.17, any regression it causes will have to be
fixed and we can then backport the fix.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24 13:08 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rtc: mc146818-lib: fix RTC presence check" failed to apply to 5.16-stable tree gregkh
2022-01-24 14:45 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-24 14:52   ` Greg KH
2022-01-24 16:27     ` Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-26 13:56       ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfFS9PFhQYssAAMj@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).