From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB01EC433EF for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234606AbiA1O3K (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:29:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232446AbiA1O3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:29:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A21C061714; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id q141-20020a1ca793000000b00347b48dfb53so4210382wme.0; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:29:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cBSmv6ogb1cxiwO45LAPv1J5ovdz5y9xPUc2j3/AZeY=; b=CuWJuLyc6hZWPi10EE0eOFSkOZZCYkXImgtkRZpUaw7VImcl8LuS1ZDPiVfI3FGbvU kbyqx5ocCX+DEg3REQOw1Qe57WtFn4JJVkTulQyhc6mgSZQKpsrt/VvvmJyYA3v6GJ/g lXI/9Gn0PFl1AHYCMsJxiLR7AvhhtQJ9O48nRWnkPmpa+8n0y4kKUmUpVxi6pzbamCjy 53J99lwhXFZBzImsDKTImK0pv8srfveMU7/glZPR7lGxSs4MqtOipW+1H9lMt7nspgWa WnwaRAy1lgOCv3qGrt5hqIz4jj/vlusxi7aPjvBYAuaI352e6PpQg/57Uxewyblfcj3c myJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cBSmv6ogb1cxiwO45LAPv1J5ovdz5y9xPUc2j3/AZeY=; b=v24ubdIN5YC11xGEEaEWcq3X6u7Aei712r5G8z8v1TWuHm39wPjplrZHn8lB3/QGnd xGTQukYIN1ZP1IfpnIV7ZnLhrqxcAHq1ITWKyJwKynecao7FWJBqdTRCWb+/BctI5FuZ JKraR9xf0xoDXVVuTRzQdRsrgtSf7AGr2aqAVym+UePYAOY7Rfsst6ntRDKbn5xaYyON xIxLHr/eaAx36QiOPQzg6+Cis5xdVjiaEjxow+qqLA37o0EF65npqr7iM/Gl7HKzEf8E 3TEEs0W7Kh3n8fGBgVoSg/vfN1z6LqC+ZtJwDsDJV5gXwOhQTzvFXhC/a3HHoM8k1Ygd BxsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532l1OaEd9VdZgNHZX9MMefiUnswRQY2xv2Bp2V4FlB33hHGm36j B0vOorrjTtNKUSspZOftW5s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymsXJu3dPTiIpIW1Di6atglsnzDkCxFVcyTEm5EVMM/m2gt/4JdaZU5jWR9wywus94/vWalA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cbda:: with SMTP id n26mr16464409wmi.76.1643380147986; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm5507162wrs.6.2022.01.28.06.29.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:29:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:29:05 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/12] 5.15.18-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220127180259.078563735@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127180259.078563735@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. > There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/667 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/671 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/672 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip