From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283CBC433F5 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238790AbiBJQD6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:03:58 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:58920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238433AbiBJQD5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:03:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6388B8; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:03:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id d14-20020a05600c34ce00b0037bf4d14dc7so3630759wmq.3; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:03:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2xF053KIw30nL+7mS9g3wv9CW2QElTIChX0OJqPTszc=; b=FczoO6cObrWTfaY/ikD3OA/l1n4TR5YQ9il61pSRasI3yzxUQsAOOfTx8UebI+WLoN qx1SOEjfKQS7t9fX7oEN6YpENTYn4kHJ4SmYT6Puwzx65hCvELHj/caZC72JSYkkuC5j EOJUT69X7+3JvPm0d3cU8YygYY49ofe1lZbsHILvh7qj8iJshxw32SSA4E0sKW1SgPFJ ab3DVJ4J9b2+h1Yu7hG8C6Ov3VDaG1TcxIdEDeLIdUWvhTfjFYxd3K0hJqlExZJQSV/d 8y0uMnkcEDXLaifEiYJA1YGZ/Ua4uaIUqgEaLkn3QRf0Ubj+K27C9mnS1ChhAiFB4wIT zihQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2xF053KIw30nL+7mS9g3wv9CW2QElTIChX0OJqPTszc=; b=43Lwf891u3s1iiWf1NtlUbHVAB0yqpEe8531cFppVhpD3kjdFQO3pqNHF13MfUhD0n jWg38Og5ZTAVb22lOzHpcFzSJlAVX9IWv/4UYSGBwyzZSWSgRth57jSouC2inwoXtUvb FZ0kXZUFaPAtuYyq3/cn4zQJLs9ZdixRH6OLWjd2/KeNuW+TBUT9At96qpKu7ba6PCyK atRVhjmZEDZf0AjDqB3JdhKvh2DiThORV5JT6Tl8ML4vZ6fwW4/G6pz0S/anu0FUgY8E 5dwnBYUpJEEJ6ZaqPo0jv5epzDEdSnGMvk2iPCeV1v+BLhz51nHcKKl4qTUMGwj31fC0 +yDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hENel3P3bigHswpq1etBKee62REe18KlMKGXRhWEqPZ+PGxJM ogbe2SJjAKnQ8ebd0pzRFIiQYob9ouUZbA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzm+pH6rNm+jo0Se4bsZ0PE4OR4R4cOhiR/qyGh8aaq+Rtco/5CuAWhGMCN8QW0QSlAyg1oVw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d92:: with SMTP id p18mr2683856wms.93.1644509037372; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm7230394wrn.74.2022.02.10.08.03.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:03:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:03:55 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/1] 5.4.179-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220209191248.688351316@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209191248.688351316@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. > There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/733 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip