From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Willis Kung <williskung@google.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Correct pkru/xstate inconsistency
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:20:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgvSv4U9onBk16xF@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215153644.3654582-1-bgeffon@google.com>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 07:36:44AM -0800, Brian Geffon wrote:
> There are two issues with PKRU handling prior to 5.13. The first is that
> when eagerly switching PKRU we check that current is not a kernel
> thread as kernel threads will never use PKRU. It's possible that
> this_cpu_read_stable() on current_task (ie. get_current()) is returning
> an old cached value. By forcing the read with this_cpu_read() the
> correct task is used. Without this it's possible when switching from
> a kernel thread to a userspace thread that we'll still observe the
> PF_KTHREAD flag and never restore the PKRU. And as a result this
> issue only occurs when switching from a kernel thread to a userspace
> thread, switching from a non kernel thread works perfectly fine because
> all we consider in that situation is the flags from some other non
> kernel task and the next fpu is passed in to switch_fpu_finish().
>
> Without reloading the value finish_fpu_load() after being inlined into
> __switch_to() uses a stale value of current:
>
> ba1: 8b 35 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%esi
> ba7: f0 41 80 4d 01 40 lock orb $0x40,0x1(%r13)
> bad: e9 00 00 00 00 jmp bb2 <__switch_to+0x1eb>
> bb2: 41 f6 45 3e 20 testb $0x20,0x3e(%r13)
> bb7: 75 1c jne bd5 <__switch_to+0x20e>
>
> By using this_cpu_read() and avoiding the cached value the compiler does
> insert an additional load instruction and observes the correct value now:
>
> ba1: 8b 35 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%esi
> ba7: f0 41 80 4d 01 40 lock orb $0x40,0x1(%r13)
> bad: e9 00 00 00 00 jmp bb2 <__switch_to+0x1eb>
> bb2: 65 48 8b 05 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0(%rip),%rax
> bb9: 00
> bba: f6 40 3e 20 testb $0x20,0x3e(%rax)
> bbe: 75 1c jne bdc <__switch_to+0x215>
>
> The second issue is when using write_pkru() we only write to the
> xstate when the feature bit is set because get_xsave_addr() returns
> NULL when the feature bit is not set. This is problematic as the CPU
> is free to clear the feature bit when it observes the xstate in the
> init state, this behavior seems to be documented a few places throughout
> the kernel. If the bit was cleared then in write_pkru() we would happily
> write to PKRU without ever updating the xstate, and the FPU restore on
> return to userspace would load the old value agian.
>
> Fixes: 0cecca9d03c9 ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
> Signed-off-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Willis Kung <williskung@google.com>
> Tested-by: Willis Kung <williskung@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 ++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 15:36 [PATCH] x86/fpu: Correct pkru/xstate inconsistency Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 15:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 16:19 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 17:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 17:10 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 16:20 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-02-15 17:07 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 17:50 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 17:55 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 19:22 ` [PATCH stable 5.4,5.10] " Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 19:44 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 21:32 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-15 21:42 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-15 21:48 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 2:01 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 10:05 ` Greg KH
2022-02-16 10:05 ` Greg KH
2022-02-16 15:14 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-16 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-17 13:31 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-17 16:44 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-17 20:42 ` Brian Geffon
2022-02-24 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-02-25 12:01 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 21:14 ` [PATCH] " Guenter Roeck
2022-02-15 21:36 ` Brian Geffon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgvSv4U9onBk16xF@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williskung@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox