From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8227EC433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229468AbiBVMH1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:07:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46472 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229437AbiBVMH1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:07:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C95EA90276; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id k3-20020a1ca103000000b0037bdea84f9cso1633328wme.1; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:07:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IJKZ3DzNTnMs7ghsS35I7GgW6AncsP9hbNlD6hh1Vyo=; b=q6t21GadQCxE3Kbueq749cAc/V4/hcdwM0SUfy/FDzyv31mMdj5Fo/GUT7qrpWOuUP m612nkEMUP0rw4rxKm29j0FadlfiRODNqgbV5AJxnknxmh/W1vttd1lvy6beYtBWU870 hwCA6+kQ3nNokd3gzbm2upggDJKHmSJ0WCgREoqjxYDlNJTKo6AkF2WrjtTNiIfrKk9n gDYwoPnlOsVNZuX4/y34s/97A7u0Q690eKfSOAcT5vLIIkHBxYlmVkpWhsvdMDyUAkyX QFaix36IuzZxcQeoooIIqjO92bEdjYdwGUTZsVf6C6bR1iAbdSHt0Clqiuizf3ejagRj Hxiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IJKZ3DzNTnMs7ghsS35I7GgW6AncsP9hbNlD6hh1Vyo=; b=mRPTHI3FqXEeCrchs3AFRaZVbpGo4PH76PKQ9EKOlQ2XIyTaAXZ5ioLt13K7Db4u5U gObrDcJa+buOVAg3m6qfbuCl6KcnyIiy90rAuEpUBRywdpwtC6S7hANaETbh3uBd60n/ rX42jACyRRocY/y0/u57XSG/ll5xJqMae9O2ZyQzqvK9FwvZgTzQ14jTSjGpAgU+eBoK /2FZNjKkJnOXXTewcq3wTrWTqvrT+D/QA6Rzug7L8ib9qaXvGWZWe1wlqRWP9A4EJ2a9 PyXWPn/I9yUpqB/dfLdMvCNHg5BOiKCwiOXWAMunyCwyXs53ZO7MZCzN0WG8Ksn4iXSl 1Pyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FDTQ6FMyqgGEa2YNozR2+89zpZvjsRghjTdPLFM0HRO/51k0h KrP+dQs6WbpXrVpQZo03qbY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHWhIZ/wGrUCALXDDN5Z8Q7E6OAlvwAkMOx26DrNupE9NEXBPJCYbT6OFbKR17uYPWxtnOew== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:35c9:0:b0:37b:edec:4d88 with SMTP id c192-20020a1c35c9000000b0037bedec4d88mr3049959wma.159.1645531620387; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm53992582wrd.78.2022.02.22.04.06.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:06:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:06:58 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/121] 5.10.102-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220221084921.147454846@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220221084921.147454846@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:48:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.102 release. > There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:48:58 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/797 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/799 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip