From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB81C433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229834AbiBVMFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:05:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229761AbiBVMFV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:05:21 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBBD15D394; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id j17so6067727wrc.0; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:04:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=NJos+zEViQMblxHjKBjy9ykego33RJXVaT8cb59knio=; b=i1cUTK3XerPPdYb6D1O63CRKrN5Qulg/qCDUP6fS5GqY6aSDbhIdtuDhHykAtHhYeq ineSV3Ejx/gwktRhpW7BvWg7qA5JL0mM8oiRMvYHsnd/JzKyZNp++I2cYeMw2N5Y9NiY nHNP/LnkL5zmkx8OgBmMH+C4Jyw1UmULDIG8jcSGq5BtYSE0FTWqsxztqLSPnHkETF63 4DEm8vSJDt48sDrT+L8+Tj1jGSCLYpL+fxewblytJlDm+Ot4v0bdBP9l6sZkOSrOBN1e DoWr5hjIvtR4vs8q6lzsKNOLACzacNgHRISEU4w9zHCSdWktQHbGKJI6xCcjpkkanWrL E9+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=NJos+zEViQMblxHjKBjy9ykego33RJXVaT8cb59knio=; b=Lc7l1190nMW0+G3mPRFmorZpopMQxp+rbsXez4gFXgn4rqiCgoVeBU1r9Zl75HI3/m VqImu+HXETN8MxVtR8M5Gz9mhY6wPiSoGWbkoZOkedUhJsVYuHCNv58lG7ttt8bmwTvV y8Yxx5YtxSHWT7gbXyp5YJcIOn+RurobbLGKo1RAXRQjcwwJgvbpEEzO5QQ51lnlK+n3 3vsZvTeA6bZ7aPiNk8BIpF5De1KIdnbFQqxl7aK0vizGfMV6wFXllFjiZ6A2Viu5blZR XjxU3E55KhxMH+kq1FLtUP5GUM0np4RjmqlNqQc5S7Z9jki9pzNe37wNYuHOB9eDqjzi jFyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YVUDaix55ELDpaPtDrt1tIJEiUWey03GvvfkjXM7kHrLHyXP8 UATPeY9hGQJz7wGR8si4Edc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr8kLjZ6BViDqLtShmBYQxL0l8nZ3cJL/AItKcsG6lPtlaHwuMyvJFlMVK5o4O6irp4CObXQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ec51:0:b0:1e3:d68:6398 with SMTP id w17-20020adfec51000000b001e30d686398mr18946670wrn.203.1645531494400; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u11sm55460114wrt.108.2022.02.22.04.04.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:04:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:04:51 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/80] 5.4.181-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220221084915.554151737@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220221084915.554151737@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:48:40AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.181 release. > There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:48:58 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/792 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip