From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C16C433EF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347970AbiCHPrj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:47:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347968AbiCHPrj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:47:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451024EF79; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id bi14-20020a05600c3d8e00b00386f2897400so1634834wmb.5; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:46:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wALI3BNBHP4wAWHHorx9ErKsuNnx499LEALEzU6+p48=; b=YevuNuxVwow8w4+JHLBABY8IUBVMW5yO46x0YwbwfSqLKVAX4g0SJ1Ow0Dy4S6fL1V YG98OS4Iwd/wejszV/mq8x9UeBRR6VJyW4OVoce8iFkQEgB0RT1B8gBc3qwfICDK4JWh GbKhTX8xeu5+W6PquPGxZXC//IFU32oGlfuQcNQLfNI7QKnmxuvGHFaj2gXbE7U7UQIe EtKNSAetDeqtwmxAWz8MYX+urFoWs1PJHHdtikyBiulmmDsf+42cetDIJ9LGpEJQkJ9R YVMbs12bJfaVcW1Ltic06maPfusAkOAGINFL8SAbLMgC/3YryobzqE1laKrPdQ/dQfwI dhoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wALI3BNBHP4wAWHHorx9ErKsuNnx499LEALEzU6+p48=; b=bG9Pduk6oWe6Y6+XwQ6xtvRIX/0VuP6pSQDwVMXXC8ZW25RydpPPD2uI+iTtICZDoY JfKng5EcrkMt62vIBEp9jXGfZ0juggg/vtA8zKHFIhvMayNjGjJEEhYbPhel87bE/3qT gCnmuwhA2Rh0jjy9g7pm1GfGqUzT4lkgP2H2odpqXJsPQqONhUkgEAkzjFUZW5DJm2SW kYRZpHmweFRNfgYS3pSS9Tg7EP9q2vTsGWcQSTw7DuNr9igturSJJ1CDYxml0YsIFrys ifJtPL3HgR57CB2P3AT0+oKCDlBSmnWgpjyuTyfWZZ2FA/THNsQ5c1qEA5EeGRlkSjoW cEww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hgf+aSniJnRJNAWf9fURrG6p7NuY41JESBpMJAVAJ70wDHcoQ 5U4UOjWcNm+htEwPTwRvKKg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrVfLFkmVtvwkvMB3YJ+1GYQsniduCTsCGvvuoqIFakr/EPNe4PyBK3MrDHUZ2x4PuSRN3SQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f87:b0:389:9ef5:dd36 with SMTP id n7-20020a05600c4f8700b003899ef5dd36mr4158221wmq.82.1646754400909; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n20-20020a05600c501400b0038995ede299sm2487470wmr.17.2022.03.08.07.46.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:46:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:46:38 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.183-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220307091639.136830784@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220307091639.136830784@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:18:33AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.183 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 09:16:25 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 65 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/853 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip