From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613B3C433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345669AbiCKKJu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:09:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345238AbiCKKJt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:09:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469932DF8; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id e24so12118082wrc.10; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MtTc6ORFeGZwXVwFyTMld44sHdzomnrsBg/8msyyWrw=; b=iHKBpZcOYrfgdvK1D5P+bBlPh3tN2j7aXH7Xxx9mgzpU8qJUx3a2TKOCOUwE9BS9DP twSqoMCTEx1Fs2H0J5XEeUuB4JDVe0WL9JSO2B1dKTdYm4QMyHe/6krNsNISRAY6RM81 B8k7jZguSM/9VBd4lT2Zg6Da6aa/HwwN1YPNXUoV0RVNfTK3cUGsGwNKNN44d5I+oRzU Io2WFP4uOAP4a7EhQZdZ5D2I/C0Jy72+RIN8MkTqWxwpH92btXntGCMgeV0eJH7Il1vv 6gPg31aPQ2tO0RXO8wec9ebwHP5LlFU8f/RJupnrUAfMGRVaSF9CGUUuDFMBCa/Q9Mx2 Ms4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MtTc6ORFeGZwXVwFyTMld44sHdzomnrsBg/8msyyWrw=; b=fSrJvqyeW1pcSOXc1VtBv9ouUieBNVok3LneUIH4+mJVZeESd4LjnVzRwXn5zGb2Hb nhNQnGT3A4sEBjRTdkW96Y1QSCc4Yo4uUQh/KYwAABXhihd4QDMVZbN1nSFFj7NAvi1R 62WjUL1lQvulh1kIEkIMcLr7VCwgfHjzrHECJZwxISLv+EVDtk3vGk73ItAq5uxc8ON7 oVKo4Ya7gj0NdGBbIqLVG6+FLPyx4rs/oVviNgCGFOjJl/fiygN4PpljZ1rk1GJf4eJN HTHgU+RDm4CzFO+7SBDw7eUs3QzkelVt/KKmRpU6m6aL/dKIAnqmqFps/hcjtTcQrE8l O+ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EJZB47hKr6jrLH3Y8UzjE/wRWS+FZAfa+unpgIZAP8HRjCToL TN0vTo9QVLwMH4U0hD8crEM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4sj9LRc6yomVZnBo2Lq7NUXjb/limeqn9FrdTNh+vj07yAFOQBuGyH8ne9i5NmSpD6VO6mQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:43c9:0:b0:1f0:5f6a:30a0 with SMTP id v9-20020a5d43c9000000b001f05f6a30a0mr6539816wrr.274.1646993324784; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v12-20020a5d4a4c000000b001e68ba61747sm6210306wrs.16.2022.03.11.02.08.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:08:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:08:42 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/58] 5.15.28-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:18:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.28 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:07:58 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 62 configs -> 3 failures arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure Mips build failures were reported earlier, and it needs: e5b40668e93 ("slip: fix macro redefine warning") b81e0c2372e ("block: drop unused includes in ") Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/863 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/870 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/868 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip