From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC68BC433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347755AbiCKKM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:12:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40558 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347740AbiCKKMw (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:12:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEC51BF928; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id l10so4856687wmb.0; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:11:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XWWog9ZrcbURy+En9U1Yp9z2N+ClQ0Jz7PvXhWlINPA=; b=bR3WTCIoI2i/HXjv3iIT1VuPIwABYlp7o/7/SLe7quhaN9Cz/Km9RWnf/FQ4Dj7ED8 wq0OCPOfhmYGlf7hMWwznJ8noHvxvWNsmerSLjR/Y8GQyNbt8DdSiN+SsrJD3tMNRiX7 Ni8kcuuHUGQkXmLfE9xxlmZeRDT5+nlUwZzv1JVSzxk0lVV/0lVJu8nT/Kvhk2EYXBF8 AGvS8g5FdGXaqZvIoSeqs0jQrK1JMlwe8Ly2PK3JUirXD1liL9N5Qfky+nBff42G61+o 5unoDDsFQkaJM9xgOlwnx04eCz4umbzt8NZyZiZGAnSwNUcC0K1MaELFDeQeUQ1iIQvD 8Uhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XWWog9ZrcbURy+En9U1Yp9z2N+ClQ0Jz7PvXhWlINPA=; b=vsA+EKDjD4v762WDmAWbwxgA9IS6sbKf40MZ1z91NzPkwNQwyLIyZ3I5a4NJN/jnhq 7ZOV1sAQA2MNeSM6aVBBlBDd35LraevpQaYIoZCwBNvvML+5HjtCgyhqrdwG+U8RID9e DHAR+n3H+gfoHdeCM8K7LcJqePCUetCPUNaiXAWzNOYIj8aMVJqNdMoEEGCyP1FYJOIV OiNoxQZIaSeJp7ZBw2nY5bvp0kWkfQ+keFpO5IQSEeU7nSzRkkuk4mdz5j2beOgriyf+ mzA5BJgOyw3SAAL0PmyGQde6/W0gY1tg5O7QsJmfJ7Tfw8NeCqKWpNrekz7h3zDCNQmY xeUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zS3Huvj3H+ZKTDwvdWA+bj3fJu499Bgq1CmWykMZDxnHHAAu5 12YHKVly0CRR+2aMOSARdqM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoLQwf10MjQ3fNJUd75Kn+U5Htx3BCjBMXK/s5yTthUALNOUzfisPvQD2+EPEbPNbOUAGr+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c88:b0:389:bede:34d0 with SMTP id k8-20020a05600c1c8800b00389bede34d0mr15225444wms.62.1646993507804; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10-20020adfee0a000000b001f0639001ffsm9297617wrn.9.2022.03.11.02.11.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:11:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:11:45 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/58] 5.10.105-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220310140812.869208747@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310140812.869208747@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.105 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:07:58 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/862 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/867 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip