From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FBDC433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1354414AbiCPP5A (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:57:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343799AbiCPP47 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:56:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A341F5F4F0; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC91476; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89E853F7D7; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:55:41 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Darren Hart , Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , Vincent Guittot , LKML , Linux Arm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , "D . Scott Phillips" , Ilkka Koskinen , stable@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings Message-ID: References: <20220308103012.GA31267@willie-the-truck> <7ac47c67-0b5e-5caa-20bb-a0100a0cb78f@arm.com> <9398d7ad-30e7-890a-3e18-c3011c383585@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:20:32AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 03:48:50PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: [...] > > > > Yeah, I can see your point. It's the smaller hack. My solution just > > prevents us to manipulate the coregroup mask only to get the MC layer > > degenerated by the core topology code. But people might say that's a > > clever thing to do here. So I'm fine with your original solution as well. > > > > [...] > > Thanks Dietmar, > > Sudeep, do we have sufficient consensus to pull in this patch? Indeed. I have already Acked, and sure after all these discussions we have concluded that this is the best we can do though not matches everyone's taste. Greg or Will(not sure why he had asked since v3 doesn't touch arm64), Can one of you pick this patch ? -- Regards, Sudeep