From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA5FC433EF for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233732AbiCVMxA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:53:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43312 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229557AbiCVMwo (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:52:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C3CEE0A0; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id bg31-20020a05600c3c9f00b00381590dbb33so1593331wmb.3; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mXOxA9dhcIU//9wO/6nBjT/9sW2++WcqVWWbkteTpF4=; b=PTySm2pBbOPDqt0o/EghML1Ko3W3Oq8TYmxfH96BRHcbBlAYa1gk2iKgmNWFuf5TOA LKj9YixfjUbhwGsq2pUA11pEUQjEkkkdDGvgTGgoSgvrPMCoUkwr85W6JcvmrLhdg70F 2Bf5xT7BL9oc4st+1TR6CWRcbt9lFVP6M4+roOlmseucUm9p7Cs6Nr882de2Aik1JVNB TODp5hz0f+5z4CTBazjn+7bo4HW6FViGcZTsZHB4IEW1ceAVhEh8WFoF/Be1bYe7Wrfc vpj3Ctpc5YlyLwvfbEISDwc0eKMjVCl//+nv8XSbe0Fn7gg6nmdWihIeV7IMLMAjol6s 7tWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mXOxA9dhcIU//9wO/6nBjT/9sW2++WcqVWWbkteTpF4=; b=1504JmAT3IdwLizOdcR2kJps2T/uAsaD4OtrDiDwOSzAmmWvdHJ+vwPT+ASonUDGZy vpej4JKuSc9PgqXKN1KsJMRT+T0Mw3F7fXZEZ6ZCl05EFzdWoiXXy5tct+ysGK09M5O3 mPn8/4n0itQoqiySigY0iqMLmE3NK/K2hta/ejr3vW+BOZPGigT3r8iMplB+yaFSsCK5 AncF0XDAfyPAOyUellGWvPg9YSRYYJCfrXqz7KOX9y+tyY72iKgDXCbskaDh1MWhpX31 UAROD9vpSQtAkwhd4g2JRSpy1CsgGzxBGyC65snI6KSPxDUVRWLMFjs2xJHHTMEG3gWi HNmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T5oCj7zAe3IoXCaEvdq9pPn7PeMGo/UL14P+2sOuhMQdSDPzj vK4slHZOvPLXb4Qt60CiDl4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwW9rM/NDaXccIOO7vosxrwb2DZ7l4ISio/yDraGKTPkt4Ifkr0hwqP2Am0DI8vcJncUsZNfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:190e:b0:38c:b1ea:f4ac with SMTP id j14-20020a05600c190e00b0038cb1eaf4acmr3698832wmq.70.1647953475899; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 05:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bg42-20020a05600c3caa00b00380deeaae72sm2050190wmb.1.2022.03.22.05.51.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 05:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:51:13 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/30] 5.10.108-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220321133219.643490199@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220321133219.643490199@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/924 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/928 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip