From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"open list:RISC-V ARCHITECTURE" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, ukl@pengutronix.de,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix build with binutils 2.38
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:05:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkXfdyDISV6S6+kY@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331105112.7t3qgtilhortkiq4@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3764 bytes --]
Hi,
On 2022-03-31 12:51, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Cc += linux-sparse, Uwe, Luc Van Oostenryck
>
> tl;dr:
>
> A recent change in the kernel regarding the riscv -march handling breaks
> current sparse.
>
> On 31.03.2022 12:39:14, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 31.03.2022 12:32:47, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > On 26.01.2022 18:14:42, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
> > > > means that the csr read/write (csrr*/csrw*) instructions and fence.i
> > > > instruction has separated from the `I` extension, become two standalone
> > > > extensions: Zicsr and Zifencei. As the kernel uses those instruction,
> > > > this causes the following build failure:
> > > >
> > > > CC arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.o
> > > > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h: Assembler messages:
> > > > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:71: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrr a5,0xc01'
> > > > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:71: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrr a5,0xc01'
> > > > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:71: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrr a5,0xc01'
> > > > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:71: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrr a5,0xc01'
> > > >
> > > > The fix is to specify those extensions explicitely in -march. However as
> > > > older binutils version do not support this, we first need to detect
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.15+
> > > > Cc: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/Makefile | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > > > index 8a107ed18b0d..7d81102cffd4 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > > > @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ riscv-march-$(CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I) := rv32ima
> > > > riscv-march-$(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I) := rv64ima
> > > > riscv-march-$(CONFIG_FPU) := $(riscv-march-y)fd
> > > > riscv-march-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C) := $(riscv-march-y)c
> > > > +
> > > > +# Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which moves some
> > > > +# instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei extensions.
> > > > +toolchain-need-zicsr-zifencei := $(call cc-option-yn, -march=$(riscv-march-y)_zicsr_zifencei)
> > > > +riscv-march-$(toolchain-need-zicsr-zifencei) := $(riscv-march-y)_zicsr_zifencei
> > > > +
> > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -march=$(subst fd,,$(riscv-march-y))
> > > > KBUILD_AFLAGS += -march=$(riscv-march-y)
> > >
> > > I'm on current linus/master, this change breaks on current Debian
> > > testing with:
> > >
> > > | make: Leaving directory 'linux'
> > > | SYNC include/config/auto.conf.cmd
> > > | GEN Makefile
> > > | GEN Makefile
> > > | CC scripts/mod/empty.o
> > > | CHECK linux/scripts/mod/empty.c
> > ^^^^^
> > It's actually "sparse" that breaks
> >
> > > | invalid argument to '-march': '_zicsr_zifencei'
> >
> > | $ sparse --version
> > | 0.6.4 (Debian: 0.6.4-2)
I confirm the issue. To make things clear, it's not a Makefile issue,
sparse get passed the correct -march=rv64ima_zicsr_zifencei value, and
only display the part it can't parse.
On the medium/long term, sparse should get fixed to support those
extensions. On the short term, we need to find a way to get different
flags for sparse than for as/gcc.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-31 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 17:14 [PATCH] riscv: fix build with binutils 2.38 Aurelien Jarno
2022-01-28 10:05 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2022-02-10 17:40 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-02-10 17:56 ` Greg KH
2022-03-31 10:32 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-03-31 10:39 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-03-31 10:51 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-03-31 17:05 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2022-03-31 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-31 19:42 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-01 6:53 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-04-01 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-01 17:55 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkXfdyDISV6S6+kY@aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ukl@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox