From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9996BC433EF for ; Sat, 14 May 2022 14:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233216AbiENO0Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2022 10:26:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233258AbiENO0H (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 May 2022 10:26:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF1E13F7A; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id k126-20020a1ca184000000b003943fd07180so6171976wme.3; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:26:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1Ibwgo9kMXrq789T7CgEdIWGaZoChbTv3X0i3RzzY0A=; b=GwAsvosKirzfXhuEHcBFQMZ3atTXd1/1/hqGmMFtlGXhr/rpWRqI/nKkA4KJ4iN22L YkozfJ0A2oqf0SkcPAKLgsOKESo3Mn5tZesvWIYs0lUAwBxjpSEUzEysG1TFtS43bqic xoeOM1yMYa8vv46jH2yfG/CGweU7B1469OXuHazQl3xo8sz4ROIcR3INaNkbJoVgTyua NUlvpSWCTeKJlQIpGDZjWErEMGxawlXyibVpTgG9fv3+GIAErFWlqSLxuxJpf5lmu1X0 GvIDnOSlh72ByaMW04CTEgOZUdkTJcIRbetuXncS9pUfUJ+POdIf2jvolD8hcFuQzElr KZ7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1Ibwgo9kMXrq789T7CgEdIWGaZoChbTv3X0i3RzzY0A=; b=k/GZ5Lq1l4cI+YxKZxDjbVr9N1X7h9BjY0RvI43VmNr66iUgyk26iylDE/6Qv8O+Hp sYtL0Pnc8p6RhFALcjQ90vG6SC5CQgFtpdTK1vPTb0LJhMf058CkOzoqXO1c3dCWGgdj IVHgdwned/lyetKzXujRGbVlZtox0vONw7Ix+bWQYUU3LBLgvQJUqEiowbmY5B8QnkfF mtj5yvWuKuh+sz/IYC6iQsLI0JI/seCiHSPwPAvM5SKxPSwhe10IAW21biDcUuNSSm9W 8jR0rYN5dOURbbxUPpjrS1V4qnkX5FsKBStgrVEttZNKGp74RffKyP4dCkYt8FmWIJEe Uhmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326C6U7ntYjNOP2Tq279usIMNcYC/4a1FpjFmI/80l9dlOOLD7E f3ntwYiylRyHEP8YNqrIFghDZhOX/io= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8IjQ/FJJIxJShcuKSm1vQZ7XP2Ftv2kaJqcHmyZpJ3Ia8eWdiUii5tE5bSGK9bzV8nk4NfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d18:b0:394:6469:abec with SMTP id l24-20020a05600c1d1800b003946469abecmr9108599wms.89.1652538365208; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-98-37-191.as13285.net. [2.98.37.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8-20020a05600c354800b003945cdd0d55sm5740858wmq.26.2022.05.14.07.26.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 14 May 2022 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 15:26:03 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/21] 5.15.40-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220513142229.874949670@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220513142229.874949670@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:23:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.40 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 62 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1141 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1145 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1142 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip