public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode
@ 2022-05-17  3:31 Chao Yu
  2022-05-17 18:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2022-05-17  3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Chao Yu, stable, Ming Yan,
	Chao Yu

Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be
reproduced. The bug message is:

The kernel message is shown below:

kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:611!
Call Trace:
 evict+0x282/0x4e0
 __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0
 dput+0x2dd/0x720
 do_renameat2+0x596/0x970
 __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90
 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895

The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both inline_data and encrypted flags.
During f2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted by rename(), it
will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page
cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered in clear_inode().

Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in
sanity_check_inode().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Ming Yan <yanming@tju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao.yu@oppo.com>
---
v4:
- introduce and use f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk() only for
sanity_check_inode().
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 fs/f2fs/file.c   |  2 +-
 fs/f2fs/inline.c | 11 ++++++++---
 fs/f2fs/inode.c  |  3 +--
 fs/f2fs/namei.c  |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 7faf230f101f..65442ab03d32 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;
 /*
  * inline.c
  */
-bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
+bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode, bool sanity_check);
 bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode);
 void f2fs_do_read_inline_data(struct page *page, struct page *ipage);
 void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
@@ -4141,6 +4141,19 @@ static inline void f2fs_set_encrypted_inode(struct inode *inode)
 #endif
 }
 
+static inline bool f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	/*
+	 * used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not
+	 * been synchronized to inmem fields.
+	 */
+	if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && (file_is_encrypt(inode) ||
+		F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL ||
+		file_is_verity(inode)))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
 /*
  * Returns true if the reads of the inode's data need to undergo some
  * postprocessing step, like decryption or authenticity verification.
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 0a554730d2c4..73ba1c6dceaa 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ int f2fs_truncate(struct inode *inode)
 		return err;
 
 	/* we should check inline_data size */
-	if (!f2fs_may_inline_data(inode)) {
+	if (!f2fs_may_inline_data(inode, false)) {
 		err = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index a578bf83b803..331ecd8af80c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 #include "node.h"
 #include <trace/events/f2fs.h>
 
-bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
+bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode, bool sanity_check)
 {
 	if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
 		return false;
@@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
 	if (i_size_read(inode) > MAX_INLINE_DATA(inode))
 		return false;
 
-	if (f2fs_post_read_required(inode))
-		return false;
+	if (sanity_check) {
+		if (f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk(inode))
+			return false;
+	} else {
+		if (f2fs_post_read_required(inode))
+			return false;
+	}
 
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index 2fce8fa0dac8..3384100dde0b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) &&
-			(!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))) {
+	if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) && !f2fs_may_inline_data(inode, true)) {
 		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
 		f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix",
 			  __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
index c549acb52ac4..514088f707ed 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 	if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_XATTR))
 		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_XATTR);
 
-	if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA) && f2fs_may_inline_data(inode))
+	if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA) && f2fs_may_inline_data(inode, false))
 		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_DATA);
 	if (f2fs_may_inline_dentry(inode))
 		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_DENTRY);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode
  2022-05-17  3:31 [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode Chao Yu
@ 2022-05-17 18:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2022-05-18 12:29   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2022-05-17 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Ming Yan, Chao Yu

On 05/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be
> reproduced. The bug message is:
> 
> The kernel message is shown below:
> 
> kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:611!
> Call Trace:
>  evict+0x282/0x4e0
>  __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0
>  dput+0x2dd/0x720
>  do_renameat2+0x596/0x970
>  __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90
>  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895
> 
> The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both inline_data and encrypted flags.
> During f2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted by rename(), it
> will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page
> cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered in clear_inode().
> 
> Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in
> sanity_check_inode().
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Ming Yan <yanming@tju.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao.yu@oppo.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - introduce and use f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk() only for

Can we do like this?

---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h   |  1 +
 fs/f2fs/inline.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 fs/f2fs/inode.c  |  3 +--
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index e9e32bc814df..000468bf06ca 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -4019,6 +4019,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;
  * inline.c
  */
 bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
+bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
 bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode);
 void f2fs_do_read_inline_data(struct page *page, struct page *ipage);
 void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index a578bf83b803..daf8c0e0a6b6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -14,21 +14,41 @@
 #include "node.h"
 #include <trace/events/f2fs.h>
 
-bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
+static bool support_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
 		return false;
-
 	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
 		return false;
-
 	if (i_size_read(inode) > MAX_INLINE_DATA(inode))
 		return false;
+	return true;
+}
 
-	if (f2fs_post_read_required(inode))
+bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (!support_inline_data(inode))
 		return false;
 
-	return true;
+	return !(f2fs_encrypted_file(inode) || fsverity_active(inode) ||
+		f2fs_compressed_file(inode));
+}
+
+bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
+		return false;
+
+	if (!support_inline_data(inode))
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not
+	 * been synchronized to inmem fields.
+	 */
+	return (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) &&
+		(file_is_encrypt(inode) || file_is_verity(inode) ||
+		(F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL)));
 }
 
 bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index 2fce8fa0dac8..938961a9084e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) &&
-			(!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))) {
+	if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(inode)) {
 		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
 		f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix",
 			  __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
-- 
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode
  2022-05-17 18:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2022-05-18 12:29   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2022-05-18 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Ming Yan, Chao Yu

On 2022/5/18 2:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/17, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Yanming reported a kernel bug in Bugzilla kernel [1], which can be
>> reproduced. The bug message is:
>>
>> The kernel message is shown below:
>>
>> kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:611!
>> Call Trace:
>>   evict+0x282/0x4e0
>>   __dentry_kill+0x2b2/0x4d0
>>   dput+0x2dd/0x720
>>   do_renameat2+0x596/0x970
>>   __x64_sys_rename+0x78/0x90
>>   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215895
>>
>> The bug is due to fuzzed inode has both inline_data and encrypted flags.
>> During f2fs_evict_inode(), as the inode was deleted by rename(), it
>> will cause inline data conversion due to conflicting flags. The page
>> cache will be polluted and the panic will be triggered in clear_inode().
>>
>> Try fixing the bug by doing more sanity checks for inline data inode in
>> sanity_check_inode().
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Ming Yan <yanming@tju.edu.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao.yu@oppo.com>
>> ---
>> v4:
>> - introduce and use f2fs_post_read_required_ondisk() only for
> 
> Can we do like this?
> 
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h   |  1 +
>   fs/f2fs/inline.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   fs/f2fs/inode.c  |  3 +--
>   3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index e9e32bc814df..000468bf06ca 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -4019,6 +4019,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;
>    * inline.c
>    */
>   bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
> +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
>   bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode);
>   void f2fs_do_read_inline_data(struct page *page, struct page *ipage);
>   void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> index a578bf83b803..daf8c0e0a6b6 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> @@ -14,21 +14,41 @@
>   #include "node.h"
>   #include <trace/events/f2fs.h>
>   
> -bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
> +static bool support_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
>   {
>   	if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
>   		return false;
> -
>   	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
>   		return false;
> -
>   	if (i_size_read(inode) > MAX_INLINE_DATA(inode))
>   		return false;
> +	return true;
> +}
>   
> -	if (f2fs_post_read_required(inode))
> +bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	if (!support_inline_data(inode))
>   		return false;
>   
> -	return true;
> +	return !(f2fs_encrypted_file(inode) || fsverity_active(inode) ||
> +		f2fs_compressed_file(inode));

!f2fs_post_read_required(), otherwise looks good!

Thanks,

> +}
> +
> +bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!support_inline_data(inode))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * used by sanity_check_inode(), when disk layout fields has not
> +	 * been synchronized to inmem fields.
> +	 */
> +	return (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) &&
> +		(file_is_encrypt(inode) || file_is_verity(inode) ||
> +		(F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL)));
>   }
>   
>   bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index 2fce8fa0dac8..938961a9084e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) &&
> -			(!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))) {
> +	if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(inode)) {
>   		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>   		f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have inline_data, run fsck to fix",
>   			  __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-18 12:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-17  3:31 [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to do sanity check for inline inode Chao Yu
2022-05-17 18:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-18 12:29   ` Chao Yu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox