From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46348C43334 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 12:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235963AbiFDMYN (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2022 08:24:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41598 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231445AbiFDMYK (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2022 08:24:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C434BBE15; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 05:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id gl15so6711490ejb.4; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 05:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mEXSkUhEMm56P4ZFNvq8XO+/T30/w+hzr9rUqfNQ2yI=; b=fsfRFGnnYW9a4pCT6ufx5vyrNPwQgcbjgbWekkHVNYmFOljNZsXdgMLPl9I2qNYJV2 2MTRSx7/BwfqkAPt5ToKv2yp+72/F6+FbQ/vQ2KxL5gtK0wikQT2p2lNDOcnABKdibT0 mst0qLIIYPEwE/KQrT1koqtiTcJyweiSZIxle6kAnRkbyNPN7L2i+1z71XDZf6MmnZ3y 6Df0Ylv3ltpcTEC6rud15d8GN727fb64HxQhVv4YiNFBWnTRQfAUjFDzqf6bgKRZ+mw3 OEIjL/z8T3i5C2M2tT1feowxpBM7mWvB0HWj7Lx3iYsKhNqdDQjbI/OjCRG2knCoaGV7 4XWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mEXSkUhEMm56P4ZFNvq8XO+/T30/w+hzr9rUqfNQ2yI=; b=4Z4L1qX6E74JiG0H7PLRJDNtipQ6THIZTbiCuxRFO2XR2OAzgjpkywtt8rY+8e0352 XYgvL6xLrrZXC9NUMTdlJFudmAq24zQFUhRcXSRmPmAt8X1iOcRSpLSIWmGUPnEJMPpq +lYLqxMLhUD5VA5NbbhNywrYG8q8Mnjffe7tXYBrggI3yKnTa1eo9OtA6q4fIpO4YfpP Ovh6y5kwbm4NHR4UHQK5PSqoTBkaByPZ1QGhrqAemmdynWhiEOGTQiZviIcixqGj6wyr s9wPvCSzCTuO2O8ZXm0AZvKcCciezkjZeoF3cs/IAUJmLFmXutKq2J+kh2ayO+5DSEm6 Cdjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jl27YV47TGm2jDSYaLXCGNrUulewdlHxdCV+7zvWiAwpUHOkp XpyIkP+zmVHjA9yXkakHcEE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5XtnSuq6h2ifk3ttEZgdm/6nFke+5VwaU5meXqcZV8JmLnVqA75rvHA6KqBT1l6wJ2JkC/A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ece3:b0:6f3:da10:138a with SMTP id qt3-20020a170906ece300b006f3da10138amr13106230ejb.438.1654345448406; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-98-37-191.as13285.net. [2.98.37.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10-20020a170906488a00b006fecef65fc4sm3956896ejq.179.2022.06.04.05.24.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Jun 2022 05:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 13:24:05 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/53] 5.10.120-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220603173818.716010877@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220603173818.716010877@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:42:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.120 release. > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.3.1 20220531): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.3.1 20220531): 104 configs -> no failure arm64 (gcc version 11.3.1 20220531): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.3.1 20220531): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1261 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1267 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip