From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192CCC43334 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245758AbiFOJ0v (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 05:26:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238242AbiFOJ0v (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 05:26:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BD215828; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id z9so5962932wmf.3; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UWQhQKyh7LCFwndabc/wa7U3fjetUDKPUrL6qA9/OOQ=; b=bQdgh6MXU2h9dubnJPuRMAEdgWGuEtu84HbWVqZH7J1BE6/Jo7SD5kY3kaL10aGT1z +2eLyASFKlAribFeMES1yGj1E4xX3B/eMt0vQSkoerPofZyl4utHmCavgjk4Dwc8rCA0 QXK1LK1/wDH+rs+p3t5320XqKXVc1BjgIpA8qeRUzSusFYip3igcgpKe+MHwuJctYXyb YI5wxeze3B5dSXglaU46PU6MZpThsF6B2XhGXP3fugUL8uMWPwR/LE1jNXdW8quQ9t0F sNfDnsWLb4Bt8BMV8BPoPzt1PV4oZSqSnWqAYXlDcksYbEdv55OYMQK/mW5fcZozvbDr 03eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UWQhQKyh7LCFwndabc/wa7U3fjetUDKPUrL6qA9/OOQ=; b=EsIzqvFn0NlMbwbTfgUeKBJeWehmxyLeeSo9CVGKoQZQCWKRu9B/ZgRVyyNHig/KBG Snm5Dry40A0QgLxQHtyIhVzVy9tvSMTM8eXEDlbuB2c4j41sf7AVzD31kAHXroc59lpu Ysx3U0sEZNVj7vVAsBnvMGTqerMGPfmeLcy7bwUl3byLUyywClzPnNq5WO6SMF9kXray qo0rHUds/f5lCJ+Gptjlh6z3zQLqnrPkyADmNuR02nTHxM/9gNPatW16z4xyDqLzmpb2 OXk6ERIV9iQoll2oVs1hG335f3gI3Icwgzp+193gzk0PVAAjB2O3LPokeTGux+nAPiii ywVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OWPWgyZKkaG6jqTJL8BnjB2IZvf4IAKIS/4pqNFRLcQ4dpdbA +SEuu6p36iOpN2PvlIE16/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzosdotAY4JQkY3kVQH6a1ROLp7+In78qTkc3vRbVzm21IULNVo7ozzV40+UmQTKNE6hM6bIg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4d4:0:b0:39c:5bb7:2210 with SMTP id g20-20020a7bc4d4000000b0039c5bb72210mr8756289wmk.99.1655285208475; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bh4-20020a05600005c400b002103bd9c5acsm14775782wrb.105.2022.06.15.02.26.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:26:46 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/16] 4.19.248-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220614183720.928818645@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220614183720.928818645@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 08:40:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.248 release. > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:37:02 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220612): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1338 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip