From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E84C433EF for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236570AbiGAKit (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 06:38:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236585AbiGAKik (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 06:38:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE72510FE; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 03:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id d17so2566967wrc.10; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:38:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mgt/Z2s/iXV2JOEmbfj5qncD2GVhoZ1LXkNgUe37ArQ=; b=Lvuh3KWqnrKuz3tjEnNResZ3siQ7nP5M0v0SFvi+8mPNeEu9wFjHfSb4Qnj0ntYN2m YW6yFQc/IXk6LDQK+YW8Xo+F6UCoDpNunCB+oz0OKzwCloYULdBcOZlIXcW81loD95Ml 1LNdo587zrHpb09dSeushL/A78+2EBOTyiXLmC8/c/cgDLK1ntF1C+vZfDDJyEZpdl6B x2m9e3zJxjfE6jVeQANJVxVk9OnT286lRIcoWbk0CXaqWvkylJGOVgVRyTnLm15KJMdh hJ9e9mN04s5/pdNAat+Pbu0I9Cwfa+aXvBTZbDNo6K9CjPbWprLFYsQxQcmeCSne66QP QcyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mgt/Z2s/iXV2JOEmbfj5qncD2GVhoZ1LXkNgUe37ArQ=; b=YKMVrY3TsRcWkT0P1olVlORLOYxsrx5FxhSyLDpMFK9vlvjJN4z42S6mhM6kiL3oLo kdrOCxMkZBr3Z/PVWlENo/IGfKAJNST7iacJShNt6Bl9hfFNnHnpq/T5RDuZDyB9ahcG 2BKx2/m4166fCKlsmiAzWoXGxQAEOOv/aUziK6GSqp5Pd/luD0+DhQAKojt1W7nXoAbT KwOKd6nyw3N+INtSIHD+CCH/BFtDoeHoO3LoaysjVLO8+k6mhTYQ2iRO3MaxeJj7dVGq akbLFpKibiD1vhkXvlhlwEgUxZA2k4nim0mQqLz7HrI0jCLF1b1bh+cV9KNE1QmSF/9S 0Low== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+YpSjPgTrAS5DzpnnMdDOcnqh7sI7lOz2CXz6O7NhFowEeDgWV u3f4GL1kXVetNN4mL1McWgg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tVN5pAoe7/cFBqlOUIe8qIQWckGaWJ7gpvfcpHr15uDNm6k/waW3Vqh7xiF6N0vpXRspj2jQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1a89:b0:21b:83a9:aa6f with SMTP id f9-20020a0560001a8900b0021b83a9aa6fmr13377146wry.33.1656671912874; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a05600c4e8700b003a17ab4e7c8sm7335322wmq.39.2022.07.01.03.38.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:38:30 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/49] 4.19.250-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220630133233.910803744@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220630133233.910803744@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:46:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.250 release. > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1428 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip