From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>,
David Manouchehri <david.manouchehri@riseup.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace.
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:03:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yuo59tV071/i6yhf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220731050342.56513-1-khuey@kylehuey.com>
* Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote:
> From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
>
> When management of the PKRU register was moved away from XSTATE, emulation
> of PKRU's existence in XSTATE was added for APIs that read XSTATE, but not
> for APIs that write XSTATE. This can be seen by running gdb and executing
> `p $pkru`, `set $pkru = 42`, and `p $pkru`. On affected kernels (5.14+) the
> write to the PKRU register (which gdb performs through ptrace) is ignored.
>
> There are three relevant APIs: PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE,
> sigreturn, and KVM_SET_XSAVE. KVM_SET_XSAVE has its own special handling to
> make PKRU writes take effect (in fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate). Push that
> down into copy_uabi_to_xstate and have PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE
> and sigreturn pass in pointers to the appropriate PKRU value.
>
> This also adds code to initialize the PKRU value to the hardware init value
> (namely 0) if the PKRU bit is not set in the XSTATE header to match XRSTOR.
> This is a change to the current KVM_SET_XSAVE behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org # For edge case behavior of KVM_SET_XSAVE
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
> Fixes: e84ba47e313dbc097bf859bb6e4f9219883d5f78
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 11 +----------
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index 0531d6a06df5..dfb79e2ee81f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -406,16 +406,7 @@ int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, const void *buf,
> if (ustate->xsave.header.xfeatures & ~xcr0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(kstate, ustate);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - /* Retrieve PKRU if not in init state */
> - if (kstate->regs.xsave.header.xfeatures & XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU) {
> - xpkru = get_xsave_addr(&kstate->regs.xsave, XFEATURE_PKRU);
> - *vpkru = xpkru->pkru;
> - }
> - return 0;
> + return copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(kstate, ustate, vpkru);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate);
> #endif /* CONFIG_KVM */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c
> index 75ffaef8c299..6d056b68f4ed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> }
>
> fpu_force_restore(fpu);
> - ret = copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(fpu->fpstate, kbuf ?: tmpbuf);
> + ret = copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(fpu->fpstate, kbuf ?: tmpbuf, &target->thread.pkru);
>
> out:
> vfree(tmpbuf);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> index 91d4b6de58ab..558076dbde5b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static bool __fpu_restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx,
>
> fpregs = &fpu->fpstate->regs;
> if (use_xsave() && !fx_only) {
> - if (copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate(fpu->fpstate, buf_fx))
> + if (copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate(tsk, buf_fx))
> return false;
> } else {
> if (__copy_from_user(&fpregs->fxsave, buf_fx,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index c8340156bfd2..1eea7af4afd9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ static int copy_from_buffer(void *dst, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size,
>
>
> static int copy_uabi_to_xstate(struct fpstate *fpstate, const void *kbuf,
> - const void __user *ubuf)
> + const void __user *ubuf, u32 *pkru)
> {
> struct xregs_state *xsave = &fpstate->regs.xsave;
> unsigned int offset, size;
> @@ -1235,6 +1235,22 @@ static int copy_uabi_to_xstate(struct fpstate *fpstate, const void *kbuf,
> for (i = 0; i < XFEATURE_MAX; i++) {
> mask = BIT_ULL(i);
>
> + if (i == XFEATURE_PKRU) {
> + /*
> + * Retrieve PKRU if not in init state, otherwise
> + * initialize it.
> + */
> + if (hdr.xfeatures & mask) {
> + struct pkru_state xpkru = {0};
> +
> + copy_from_buffer(&xpkru, xstate_offsets[i],
> + sizeof(xpkru), kbuf, ubuf);
Shouldn't the failure case of copy_from_buffer() be handled?
Also, what's the security model for this register, do we trust all input
values user-space provides for the PKRU field in the XSTATE? I realize that
WRPKRU already gives user-space write access to the register - but does the
CPU write it all into the XSTATE, with no restrictions on content
whatsoever?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-31 5:03 [PATCH] x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace Kyle Huey
2022-08-03 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-08-03 15:12 ` Kyle Huey
2022-08-03 17:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 17:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-03 17:35 ` Kyle Huey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yuo59tV071/i6yhf@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.manouchehri@riseup.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox