From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: asmadeus@codewreck.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 5.4 4.19] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv9uV0/ucdSp6McY@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816014925.336922-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:49:25PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> [ Upstream commit aa7aeee169480e98cf41d83c01290a37e569be6d ]
>
> Ensure that the fid's iounit field is set to zero when a new fid is
> created. Certain 9P operations, such as OPEN and CREATE, allow the
> server to reply with an iounit size which the client code assigns to the
> p9_fid struct shortly after the fid is created by p9_fid_create(). On
> the other hand, an XATTRWALK operation doesn't allow for the server to
> specify an iounit value. The iounit field of the newly allocated p9_fid
> struct remained uninitialized in that case. Depending on allocation
> patterns, the iounit value could have been something reasonable that was
> carried over from previously freed fids or, in the worst case, could
> have been arbitrary values from non-fid related usages of the memory
> location.
>
> The bug was detected in the Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) kernel
> after the uninitialized iounit field resulted in the typical sequence of
> two getxattr(2) syscalls, one to get the size of an xattr and another
> after allocating a sufficiently sized buffer to fit the xattr value, to
> hit an unexpected ERANGE error in the second call to getxattr(2). An
> uninitialized iounit field would sometimes force rsize to be smaller
> than the xattr value size in p9_client_read_once() and the 9P server in
> WSL refused to chunk up the READ on the attr_fid and, instead, returned
> ERANGE to the client. The virtfs server in QEMU seems happy to chunk up
> the READ and this problem goes undetected there.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220710141402.803295-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com
> Fixes: ebf46264a004 ("fs/9p: Add support user. xattr")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
> [tyhicks: Adjusted context due to:
> - Lack of fid refcounting introduced in v5.11 commit 6636b6dcc3db ("9p:
> add refcount to p9_fid struct")
> - Difference in how buffer sizes are specified v5.16 commit
> 6e195b0f7c8e ("9p: fix a bunch of checkpatch warnings")]
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>
> Tested on top of v5.10.136. Verified to apply to v5.4 and v4.19 and the
> resulting code was read for correctness.
>
All now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 11:49 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2022-08-15 12:51 ` asmadeus
2022-08-15 16:55 ` Tyler Hicks
2022-08-16 1:49 ` [PATCH 5.10 5.4 4.19] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation Tyler Hicks
2022-08-19 11:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yv9uV0/ucdSp6McY@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox