From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E56C00140 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232233AbiHJNWa (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:22:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232229AbiHJNW3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:22:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41B8245; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 06:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id ay12so4975096wmb.1; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 06:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=K63ZqEflkKlHTjrE9821DuVo5tu42pOb0LECm60UMOs=; b=I7skc4jMkGwwslJWVtNslWOS/iXCsgjz/gM8Bn2vnAnhVKRiJ5Y5ggqRC8NmrdM4TH no4igQRZZLoPjcXhUI7VvN8wfmr8f2MHdq7CmzTzMqmJJnILH+JIukLfoXHwfn+WfQU6 LeNnvZjuacN9WC750cdNnLjHy4N+1Mua+N55a8UJhGI6mwf6y97eMaICtDtb1g+dkMqn GY+pyHGe5Hfz6T4sqn02Q/ZX6eU44OVemTz+CCuGvFuxAz3vT4cNvLcAA4GwBX4EGpNY 5eGTFZ4iYJ6BckWWJwIkSna1UZfOFvkMo3yFmE/EaumKyDSVpZpv0BS3B+8p6in/QyPI LHHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=K63ZqEflkKlHTjrE9821DuVo5tu42pOb0LECm60UMOs=; b=NrIjgTlF35JCHymBHqxTq364lzuOnc3voDgEoZz79m8hF0kPEEm6q/eJUm5RUaqX1P l2bisNKvInuhkny87YDdyceFT65AreO5nZ825Qf3BCj7aJcu6BPAWkeY+CM1uwgeZrZ1 PqzftLLtGIis8NlXaLKgb7A4HxQHKGqs2lGu2YJUhGKUTx2TqdVFdGIHtXOu7J7IuopV SHVaj+zmoYguweytyTEf0NhoXwrJZBrku08yVFUCo3eGIsgsMx5ryxzay7zu3l3qAIv+ tSNHOPkHjrVs64Fe/m+PlKCvVj9jbAlSWD/trkDJwVMEpJiw1uj7ER0ouzLjTAP7ghms 48Gw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1jpB31Kso3MguEBid0d/WKFaYt+s8SVtmZBcW+naSRdGHRATqU Wzg1LMgXRp3rW1I0Z57Ul1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR58igy2RDlStj+pSzD7fSnafgPftynLcrKVb9EHpUs9Oi4TxvD8EIMfvHVx557ZDAj4GnRCYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3495:b0:3a4:e323:9edd with SMTP id a21-20020a05600c349500b003a4e3239eddmr2472046wmq.104.1660137747251; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 06:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2405:201:8005:8149:e5c9:c0ac:4d82:e94b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bq4-20020a5d5a04000000b002206ba7430bsm17342050wrb.15.2022.08.10.06.22.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 06:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:22:16 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.136-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220809175512.853274191@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220809175512.853274191@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220807): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1618 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1623 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip