From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11653ECAAA1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229747AbiH3Kl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:41:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229605AbiH3Kl6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:41:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7316F9D8E2; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id n17so13636078wrm.4; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:41:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Ur9LSE+726hU91hAgUo0OMhul68sy6ujWhk0uIeDHZI=; b=qVlno9n5cb+TbqRZhshHrFOsqlASjw2EL6BzeYdAHoUWeF/DFR3SU+3VYhw72gJipp ZqaoUXas/reQ8XDn0FgWkvs91x5P90UoHsmP3pQ0f/tEOlt6FyfdsNtJHgjqXpirTe9x Fstc6wOQa9uzn43+ExCDV92sOtKiJEGGpj4fiePVVV+tjSFqTShXPzmBDt/ZSXB+suYZ XEvGolSxDHQR1HZ+GrlX0CoLTaXg3tnnX1pmSImHajGEnk8P4TjuYRNVAMaindLqXu1m hLXJzk8flUkTQXVL1pBS0Xf92ZxCByv1dnPS5BHCDoKrvmjQIq/uZoXwFC261LtGgWra FG4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Ur9LSE+726hU91hAgUo0OMhul68sy6ujWhk0uIeDHZI=; b=usM9xNHAsuw/GHF0/Jq+GjNZGIkbaEr5x0A56b3jy2fwjIlG77A6znVhJf+SqQfX80 JRDqWVKYDXsnRA1kpJ4QAvbhM4qNvp97RkBY6LQRX9eXXwQKnRzlCTA1SNCviXcxvlzp sYVifIl14YfLh5dz/9zfrrTBO+OgaGGdnyV7Cu/1cmLRevm83z070HIBc81t3+aq8DBs VH75XGhFPlm0AEpqv+FUYAzzxt9KBFqEPeGCrqcvF0lXR+PRAgAs2e8vaAtZ7QKpx8EP Mu/p09I7jx6n3G58GY3uEKDmZO5MXgJOdZcpPaRH4IHb7MaaBGhNzQeAXfWUioY06bZn BVKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1nwtbJKEuEKby3HD2+FQ2EqXzoLTBrNJPhavet2wMa936hgyaI p6n3HlAS83T5ojnUh3hg7jI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR53FqQ8+jVD1Xwx/uc1sp8KKbMwx57GiifnN9mIZ/Hs1WNJDhbJtOmEKiHw+YlFBTbtdxh9Rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1a8d:b0:226:dfe2:15ed with SMTP id f13-20020a0560001a8d00b00226dfe215edmr2896756wry.110.1661856115993; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m3-20020a05600c4f4300b003a84375d0d1sm8670378wmq.44.2022.08.30.03.41.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:41:53 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/86] 5.10.140-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220829105756.500128871@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220829105756.500128871@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:58:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.140 release. > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:57:37 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1728 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1732 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip