From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/14] 5.15.62-rc1 review
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:42:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwC6eQjx8xC9y3LD@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819153711.658766010@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:40:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.62 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> fails
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Note:
s390 allmodconfig fails with:
arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:336:5: error: redefinition of 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe'
336 | int arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:12:
./include/linux/kexec.h:190:1: note: previous definition of 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' with type 'int(struct kimage *, void *, long unsigned int)'
190 | arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf, unsigned long buf_len)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by: 4dc6d49023a0 ("kexec_file: drop weak attribute from functions")
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1659
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1666
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-20 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 15:40 [PATCH 5.15 00/14] 5.15.62-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 01/14] io_uring: use original request task for inflight tracking Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 02/14] tee: add overflow check in register_shm_helper() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 03/14] net_sched: cls_route: disallow handle of 0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 04/14] ksmbd: prevent out of bound read for SMB2_WRITE Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 05/14] ksmbd: fix heap-based overflow in set_ntacl_dacl() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 06/14] Revert "x86/ftrace: Use alternative RET encoding" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 07/14] x86/ibt,ftrace: Make function-graph play nice Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 08/14] x86/ftrace: Use alternative RET encoding Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 09/14] btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 10/14] btrfs: raid56: dont trust any cached sector in __raid56_parity_recover() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 11/14] kexec_file: drop weak attribute from functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 12/14] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 13/14] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 5.15 14/14] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-20 0:42 ` [PATCH 5.15 00/14] 5.15.62-rc1 review Shuah Khan
2022-08-20 8:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-08-20 18:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-20 10:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-08-20 10:42 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2022-08-20 22:23 ` Ron Economos
2022-08-21 0:56 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwC6eQjx8xC9y3LD@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slade@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox