From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8928C25B08 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345255AbiHTKmI (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 06:42:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345238AbiHTKmI (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 06:42:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F22A721D; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 03:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d16so2470864wrr.3; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 03:42:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=wpUCvamh+ye0l2iuSNES+TALSlLBsIRaMdVzc71uTOU=; b=A3okTWC/Z/nQKnmI97eQ4g7Tn6OQTP8bZ4/mWy36NNE8TLIoKp7H/UOrIFRiGxHRr0 z3lw/5309GJfkUSvbRa928iUVdMhLKAI6OJu+kKIc33bFnvrOhewr7dLyZmE8OMa1Bcy 3JVoB3xsQOlvUixL3lNqZrjlxhvitC2WtoJDdwxxaEnwztRmBgrsZtivH+HBDOFOb5rZ CpMdVZoznJ74FkoF8l2rapPd/uMPFlx1HYZeE16b5Ws6fIW5I5APwP5zyWVezAHcZhRR 2rNxAZjrv0dua/1GFZ/YHf3GHhiPp8D9HmA2YEiF/p1OW1Lb5yEnZ0Zj/YOjlm44rAwf o/dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=wpUCvamh+ye0l2iuSNES+TALSlLBsIRaMdVzc71uTOU=; b=fIreBqFewn1tNwELcHpRUJVpzTVV9BjC37qreFxYXng/FVWn9U+zSpuT4hTQD1d9du pLu1VIWriFk2E9ZuhxlR4FFKcWxMwQyzkeG4zMMKkuCRJK8kqhTAgeg/67c3vizHeJQi xtu53M88aLprI7S64x0DI3Jl6FIVATqnWbiUix8cecXQvbRHCO4PGVyb9ZdrzeaYjbA4 1BJC/EjMFiQa3Aptm0zmJPQ8spQMaUM5joIo0usqmeClfb0sPB/WKOx0qmSTPuH3sCfZ dPHb0LLdOFQ6SqVG1lAvQ8B1R9IQiwcid5IDnD8aQNVIVGM0t53iUZLlHa88/59kEZVg bpzA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3lDhFXWUEA/EWrNJvtfOdmpd+v5jHS9OyLmOchzMXafGprfurG uH9o512+RoInS+sBPm5Bzu1jaM6pIzM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6mKBIJfUDlN4adZIWylsxOcCr0KrYZv2JMh5JBUqp/T2U4T63SyVcW0HlTfHtxGjVZ3XyvDA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f001:0:b0:225:3a99:3938 with SMTP id j1-20020adff001000000b002253a993938mr3473277wro.111.1660992124185; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 03:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16-20020adfef50000000b002205f0890eesm6386403wrp.77.2022.08.20.03.42.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 03:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:42:01 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/14] 5.15.62-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220819153711.658766010@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220819153711.658766010@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:40:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.62 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> fails xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: s390 allmodconfig fails with: arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:336:5: error: redefinition of 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' 336 | int arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:12: ./include/linux/kexec.h:190:1: note: previous definition of 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' with type 'int(struct kimage *, void *, long unsigned int)' 190 | arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf, unsigned long buf_len) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Caused by: 4dc6d49023a0 ("kexec_file: drop weak attribute from functions") Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1659 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1666 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip