From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEC2C25B08 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 09:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343993AbiHTJxS (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:53:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343944AbiHTJxR (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:53:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82059E65; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id l33-20020a05600c1d2100b003a645240a95so1209710wms.1; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:53:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=yTmsNckNaAZ+29w7J9XGVeljRtaRfGzpOqqruunQXzE=; b=AlXZQgqol+ZQyYLLlNe6RE30IbbK4i+2hruYi71ZcbzDIh4uwlmRtZa8ZezQLM9CKH Mwfepj5zZ3WB/LnhrR42Hvk3hRAisfyWGwwWuqJmuBXPQLPRbcKvJpHhjN491turXReH J3UCfP6Tms2r+AQ6OyzZeEKsHriKLhr78lkJPy4s/z7J4LutVDWnACf6smV/yr+Y6YAZ CUI6O4hpSAojf4uPh+9b64DF+Hsq57Yw1z4ROo3tZaK0tWvfGYsCTG+jVPgDCPIayM+d u4s7EtO0s0ZhEV4gLLot0HuMfS7E6misvcoed0eIDcFhPPt373QEHVf3oSBknoFxj+1C CyMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=yTmsNckNaAZ+29w7J9XGVeljRtaRfGzpOqqruunQXzE=; b=DGtow8nFIMdHb+KMZXMAIkDvJz4Fe67efOA+poLCIePKPF/ngi4TYfwxRGqqukCQI6 7c2TcTu3Bi3D+bwa2UI0b5DyvH4UEvyrIyfOzZTzZj7Xb3Tne9jX5nfegLfcFCSWig9k 9IZUJUpoYnWFgD88vpkB80ye3iBcpb9GG7ZcwYl0qC/1a6a5reKmDJa3xFoIn50kksmm zsbNiDTFmRNLFTbufTccM8hGBi3/GmJAjGyJ4IRj/R5eM+mUjgynEqdwNLD1C4ZKqLew GSAZfPjkKXbnSRe49CP2+3vPNvz/xLK8sk4txe9c3VpuN4B4YiJh5PriqOaOv5TuY+c3 bjBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0yflp7OOnv53IyMl32DyZIp/EoKZ1oGVZHUBzIzELPqJf2wkPK iCJJLLCPXuiqfO/tU/3iHTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6rO4EusgdhFNmVzGx+CBRQxesGceFjy+Mr30QRQ+4R2VVoL76UipBTN+V3VoBepajWSvJxLg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2701:0:b0:3a4:f86b:9d28 with SMTP id n1-20020a1c2701000000b003a4f86b9d28mr6894421wmn.168.1660989193955; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f14-20020a05600c154e00b003a32251c3f9sm13609214wmg.5.2022.08.20.02.53.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:53:10 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 0/7] 5.19.3-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220819153711.552247994@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220819153711.552247994@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 59 configs -> 1 failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> fails powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: csky and mips allmodconfig fails with gcc-12, passes with gcc-11. Already reported for mainline. Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1663 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1668 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip