From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78BDC00140 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229561AbiHUPc7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 11:32:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36098 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229537AbiHUPc7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 11:32:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1E018B25; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id bs25so10460114wrb.2; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:32:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=8MV32+Yt9m7Si5QwQLa4b3PLlpDqckrFp0ZXYWUDDos=; b=NfDG8DsV7gJdva8ZhPOfYP8oH/CZM6cWqdSzl+jQILATlYWT4PXV2EsgUly3TyR1aI FQfxS4phuKoDKwRsUBFya4KshB62lJPmuuevj3ihZpD05lr59cRv7B7Fn3UT1vZPWNlw nFvxbAl5k9avcgruQQMfqFrTq7W2CtyziaFTg/IRihCih/85DXhxUY0Sajl8eS0AwA9p ZGIJ4Ihqg4fx+e1iKXt0cG63wq3cFyUIRNdtJ84W9EaMdfqr3THgJdjUnzliLKUQep00 yULm20CXE50JSwm9zU20Ub1H++buQ6r26dVXY1J/oD9sIV5zy4PjzoUM1OQSifNA245S mqug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=8MV32+Yt9m7Si5QwQLa4b3PLlpDqckrFp0ZXYWUDDos=; b=hIP1Tk9qFZpaEBv+5KyusWRV2W3Ov3Puc7nSvcI1TQPh8OyzGJeOeWLviLu4/Ky801 XOL+mUEnUDDg7Au6qGtHnGjocn7EpoRSUDD91uwtFQyXgQNPvxshrLO7tm+7eqIsddwk sDltfhRTO3Es6ADhPm8AJSMiedNEisxN8AYuI6L518R9e+dUj2Lb2TS3mbtgaWeu4IxN nhdeAjQc+G59a6nFAcg/pwTSgxxERbnwe3+y7BgJRVUrEWN7b/yLGnNcNzjuthROsRHk umzqaSEzXYAkSBfhNiVPcuQ8aKR4JzMg+3J+LQEd0jejcppn+kPU4MjQ3BCafZi6jiEr 2akQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1bqpZ5lottArdYUG1AhOWQ9Kpc+N6m+uoVlGVB0X0ufuGG1ar3 Gx/zPKJH9srW1Sv6btMleoI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7taoznKUYDE3QoriSpfUsWWleApS9nfWNXRocQa0hmQRiAAOxRR2w4xe0OMrBK/Fm74ZRvyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6c62:0:b0:222:cda4:e09e with SMTP id r2-20020a5d6c62000000b00222cda4e09emr8666167wrz.449.1661095976550; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:b0c0:1:d0::dee:c001]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 22-20020a05600c231600b003a5260b8392sm13762440wmo.23.2022.08.21.08.32.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:32:55 +0000 From: Stafford Horne To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/10] 5.15.62-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220820182309.607584465@linuxfoundation.org> <20220821120903.GB2332676@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220821120903.GB2332676@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 05:09:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 08:23:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.62 release. > > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Mon, 22 Aug 2022 18:23:01 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 485 pass: 484 fail: 1 > Failed tests: > openrisc:or1ksim_defconfig > > The openrisc failure is a soft lockup during restart. I only recently > enabled the soft lockup detector, so this is probably either a false > positive or not a new problem. I'll try to track it down, but it is > not a concern for now. > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Hi Guenter, If you need help let me know, just let me know how to reproduce it. I am currently working on some qemu patches to convert qemu to multithread-tcg. I have fixed some lockup issues, but there are still some cases we get soft lockups. If you have any details I can see if it's a similar issue. -Stafford