From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD222C00140 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235862AbiHXLGF (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:06:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50878 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235675AbiHXLGE (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:06:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A9D6F24F; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id b5so16031302wrr.5; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=0xDYPLeehvGBgE/+A99URbf3gOSPMqygYMXHWfUE/jY=; b=CjsTt68lwd9LdDU692We+leDenSGd+7JZFn0P+R5pwoop/3iG+20+1HGbrmXuTlv+0 BuMZTg4mimyQuLiovKQYM3+7mX5GTq/6yiUVIbU93x0Zj8BmpMk+iAeXlJit2xK/sEwg cH0lFEY80gg20EIE0Sub70HtOK9jSm13MeusUO7Q4vzFujb1abrYLDg1Z9u2HQvslJwt sc1rxBXUZniwcfgwRbQxMrSTYhVrOM63A4aZvgyUxCdNQqipxynbsclIyK645C1zMjKw gbsi3dJKcH3Ad0cVyzHQgx09DO5e9PNSRwp3pzv5ZqvbNKV8xp2sdYv5+DeP84MupjZv ArNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=0xDYPLeehvGBgE/+A99URbf3gOSPMqygYMXHWfUE/jY=; b=i+Gef/Hy3SfWXvfaZ0S1XuEVb8OumU7wFk6492BIBIMT1vXTnbUl7F7fs/50Tk+DxW FBU4CW/Bpwa9yKedqMhUASFUMptMZOA/clNe+28SETXWje4B6IpBFpDFiQgYOWGnXcjV BH20rzvqSPi2pu2T74VNBseoXO8PiMorHao7JQho2MBXEoHH0GW7BG0h7CySsjYOTlwm BQoxGMmwMyzHmuRtUPPjP8FOj0soHTpAg5uvLT2sfFZkW9pxXUOAWDOSuAtlMYezQ770 d5Q4bHmYgFMyLFKE8HX/JQfegeVWoKf/NUmt0eDJ425tIAyTzxYpsYm0KaJot3tiqcI2 mS7w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1Zsd/Wn725l//hkjwjJETYVIX3ImW/aoYyiLHXrGJpRHI9gGWs oCsTBCa5re+Vk6BXlSA3jULNQ+q5mxt3bw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR69lLi4iBS3LZgPvjBexrOP9BfyC7sZ6Jzii6quJUTQf8C4P/+b9odxznF8cmMugGwrihCw+g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb0e:0:b0:21a:34a2:5ca9 with SMTP id c14-20020adffb0e000000b0021a34a25ca9mr16024004wrr.472.1661339162185; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18-20020a05600c425200b003a603f96db7sm1631569wmm.36.2022.08.24.04.06.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:05:59 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/389] 5.4.211-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220823080115.331990024@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220823080115.331990024@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:21:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.211 release. > There are 389 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:00:15 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1685 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip