From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/157] 5.10.138-rc3 review
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:58:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwaQ7TYreTa03btO@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824065856.174558929@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.138 release.
> There are 157 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:58:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1694
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1698
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 7:00 [PATCH 5.10 000/157] 5.10.138-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-24 8:50 ` Pavel Machek
2022-08-24 13:41 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-08-24 16:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-08-24 20:58 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2022-08-24 21:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwaQ7TYreTa03btO@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slade@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox