From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D794ECAAD5 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229854AbiICKn5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:43:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229515AbiICKn4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:43:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8225F22D; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 03:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id v16so5187304wrm.8; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:43:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=lvszZfGmCXX8IrOggyhtAC+MmHjG2/LjQopHuFCOjn8=; b=dJYBM0EKFCzD/VWmoYP/V4rdN7gBcxNGojuuZL3kCieKVnGqPIO9RxTdTKiNbVGfjk SnxdOP1DYmP5ryigKEt10Xx3fmJL59x9e4vztJ8h/gbe1h+IBmc1WhbQT/87IUG737Uk 36bNWkdpZpTXxWT4PMRw8DMkdUaxBqTDIOLvzj8N1ySpRde/cxbOlGxmyy33eK12oYFa Z/zwkVL231a9SskhHIa4Vk7CeR8HgTo3NO9WElgVMlEMYQkeujkJ9ty2hShKN/Qdpx5A DnQSher/Fwhp8U25WCk5h+hS2YECccdg+CdtCh9XbIBeqZM5mxyIa+UN2O4hZtkqyMx0 uEzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=lvszZfGmCXX8IrOggyhtAC+MmHjG2/LjQopHuFCOjn8=; b=s77HpCAyjgy+4DLYU5hcKTfXJy1K+g04oX+KgNJyRriz96eRHFl6jBgx7s6JObyG7Z lWIrAFHoi/VTcnAFawRiJMRdmXYvcW1LZv/1Kyu8Gsrig0S5ku8T14XFujvMSlVN9BVh ltMSb3r6oPkUPT2cC94BgVyx3cj5Zr/3uf30W5mRQ3LbalFfOkT3p7ut7fmC4maLH9zH RijpmtSA/exa2nL4WSkdJSlD3Cr4BomF4JPYfAAsYFjQcucflkfR4/uugMQ4oG/CXK9l rsJ8Ic2qSM149tQAlCSSa2vBHsFt+IscpdASUdyw6ZIAfnQPACEfYysOxSvNRhdlnNk3 4ndA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2otzYqPN1f6opBOqD520iEC+hfPTNa9FFcL8pxZo/l4rzT6cLX rAjniYtaJHEnIPb2rBrUao08dew45C8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4TNSSU3j4i9cczSgvke2g/qY3bsCja8QZBqSRmA4lISs8pzw0fCGmSzah8Je+KHbdKRwI0aA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d03:0:b0:226:ea3d:eb35 with SMTP id e3-20020a5d6d03000000b00226ea3deb35mr10127509wrq.476.1662201833854; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r11-20020a5d494b000000b002286231f479sm556661wrs.50.2022.09.03.03.43.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:43:51 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/37] 5.10.141-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220902121359.177846782@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220902121359.177846782@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:19:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.141 release. > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:13:47 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1756 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1759 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip