From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4CFECAAD5 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229586AbiICKlW (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:41:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229515AbiICKlW (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:41:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2EC2CCB2; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 03:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id bp20so4706716wrb.9; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:41:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=VHxvMSygKVD9CKnhhsxoMpTwOE8lJNgN8OaQ16IexB4=; b=ctnp1WprFkV18F3xytmry0sIi7rKDFIVUO824H+qHvRr7wxcSHVRvwLtGIb6ncEWWr C/XO+ldnyCP250vNpwviyPO0SV9LTKlYntdM/UMzNKkiWMhEcrADMiDdBqWrYd8j9qr8 kha3u3xC4zdzjToU2lXuYNyWipirjgs//+ol83zyh1JZ6BO5uq0UwNbcbRZHSfRnpedH HgkJzN6LJFUimOS3LR9dAwJjbJdk/r6GqrAj6xDFF8OU4Bo+mslgEvmfxSLX7cXaEsaT K5N1ZxJrh6T3sXXTHopxmlAozhrXijg0Esjg6yh/4AHc5cBtzjhcVxjI+tE42bcVba8c b0Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=VHxvMSygKVD9CKnhhsxoMpTwOE8lJNgN8OaQ16IexB4=; b=nvk9+jNlwHekqjW6S32cWfeD1jPhn4dfW4rMWMS180QilPJizFqPvI+IdQUDZRonvb jgsH68iBL2w8zAl8O9qMrQgPfHWeFsVEwlnC0k1cpBej7prfz6Hn7rwYqYDzw7Xn4HGz atLy0TJEFYYQRk28eLUIurs28TAoiMl7FipXUh6x/isfcmwBYfbGuuJsVWtmCaHjtbvL 3VTsRn5lLYmUI5tUklysIPN8AsjZj9oT7V8az6669742Z1rJbw4j3A+ZVwMxIbyEH9Xo T2QvjDPLynOLP2l7NUbj0WAvMaXiwmr98HXwYCbuSwCQvo8/F067UmR9ER4mhtIeZP6+ v1FA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2q8SjQOEVWpiqkGQLqrjp5MQQpt+vWf5lBFrpj7uC7QItD0Gsx Q9E8r4q6scjLOJBPwAVof1BrRPHAAk0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR76Eu5mo+Zm0caU9G80qHna7ylj1fTzEz1r05vmIY+gDmAKnH56VOKEGNgZcwhYnBeFSwE6ZA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e902:0:b0:225:5462:94db with SMTP id f2-20020adfe902000000b00225546294dbmr19247305wrm.481.1662201678922; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5-20020a5d6185000000b0022533c4fa48sm3444256wru.55.2022.09.03.03.41.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:41:16 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/56] 4.19.257-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220902121400.219861128@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220902121400.219861128@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:18:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.257 release. > There are 56 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:13:47 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1754 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip