From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FDEECAAD4 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229673AbiICKr6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:47:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58628 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbiICKr5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:47:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7A694EE3; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 03:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id bz13so1790019wrb.2; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:47:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=VFSZ2rBYb+KjxEeMGLXPm/i3JuUmN3UHMiZjHzMKqcA=; b=EitfbJWYQ4pqbHvWARQ9sm9Bytw9iCffC0MXi5qLi4mLWgQk9yLxsINMhLl/tM6COn iZ28njIxnfS0NMa8g5ygX7dgnizj7Pzez85imGyAPjpxmWLNcj0LzEkET9kBHog7otMs tv3dZGc18aVJeH21RSzRcL/e9BBgvy1OO4yJYMiFruNRONHGNbMZWQL0J+1CASjY2aIp Q2P2uj5lnxviYhSvUnjPFY6mCIHNVvZCUAqZy70N9TAr8+jpyldgOw6g//XFhRSkJ9qb JU0K7om8JKiOP8hIC9dczqRVSBnL80D3Ijgc+28DdVkvPkpmUva36cKmv5VZSxD0JhOT /pNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=VFSZ2rBYb+KjxEeMGLXPm/i3JuUmN3UHMiZjHzMKqcA=; b=SWSTiVABphkM618JBNOjwjh9K1P7jmRhDKWS4RiCpTe4X3eaOOnv6xviNrBkBGbDPk EjDmdtW+N6MkeYcJPbsdcnUwLr7JI7mB8NQzI+mOozSlQ9k3niHGHJxWFS4SFCxh9l0a BCPzaxb5Lez2FT39KSc/RBc2bSke8Yrm9ZPgIvSwIdef18IDOPYd5O8l0UmH32Sr8ac6 a2JjJu8GmjimOPXxfXFQ8PJ0clS2X/y6WCO510ZgUnsD5XygWMxHc5P/SBja9m9got12 HzUht0Z4SoyAT7db1IM+A60IXoVfeQLoc1DMuSqjY1J1aQIRZI0IuvjQPp/MhsY8yZ6D FKew== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0QBQeRldlGTH/Sx16SKQa2LIzlKiC2w5CiEudQovHqRuj8z5X6 XtbpxXNbiKuitt1KlDR+cyw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6ULIaCYLT3ivzX5QQI1awRSMA5ZDFRRDl3auydFue+EgytWCk49yGXyufr022liA98UmbJsw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dec9:0:b0:226:e033:c048 with SMTP id i9-20020adfdec9000000b00226e033c048mr14342636wrn.577.1662202074960; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020adfa345000000b00228610d8efcsm862352wrb.35.2022.09.03.03.47.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:47:52 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/73] 5.15.65-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220902121404.435662285@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220902121404.435662285@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:18:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.65 release. > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:13:47 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: x86_64 allmodconfig failed with gcc-12 with the error: drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c: In function 'ipc_protocol_dl_td_process': drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:406:13: error: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'cb' will never be NULL [-Werror=address] 406 | if (!IPC_CB(skb)) { | ^ In file included from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.h:9, from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol.h:9, from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:6: ./include/linux/skbuff.h:794:33: note: 'cb' declared here 794 | char cb[48] __aligned(8); It will need dbbc7d04c549 ("net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check"). Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1757 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1760 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1762 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip