From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08C6ECAAD5 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230163AbiICKt6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:49:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbiICKt5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:49:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE9D286E8; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 03:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id c11so962179wrp.11; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:49:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=XrMdVv2xUhxR5Q9kOZUXM47qxjFM4pdwsuKh8dulBXY=; b=X1THUn+uLxxNb25VDUXlkAxwbhSEA7vESxCPVQFbn/j3T9JBQ0o8jiOoOAfD0TodR7 kyyzzq5XALDLjnhj1XbWHm4MME8mhngQoct6DDU6Z6T8xEfFhMAuJuwT3kexD9btG0re Ixb7t+giDUIvY6ice111MF/3acqruDyymnnExBlSGzg2WLmKuGyyV5s71jmEmbSIitOD VW9wgYeuiFmxqjEsvvDCzpMQysrmWKNBQ514yJVCd+tO5WhjL8Q6rRWCWOEScCLrG2Wq kQJGsyMQr9etrhUtlq2ljq6weeQGhTEDyMiMoT7tpQfuZSPykwjgTzdlwlD0Q/XQeS9i o1uQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=XrMdVv2xUhxR5Q9kOZUXM47qxjFM4pdwsuKh8dulBXY=; b=CawTfQXGqhTqyWFMQCCV9uAzSOoSTphJm95GPeJ9u/hrPFKbDJcgH/wXoCIgXlWEYo 0gXaRg2sRYcT3vx5yubuA0qZ/54HoWZX1qYgqhVpo8w7HE0v4vNSXDE+l8HFOJm6z/+3 lxUJMoSpSTT+mJ7OTNbuibxcxi18lqA4faEOHEzIZiXYpS1mwAKOq57w8yyLWPlNC0ku oM2VDGKdyPQi7Llo4aZhHBLzydz4FOiqDuyUEM7uocKTM3S0OG5WHzr0FuobvgRcpqUQ iTrN72Z1LuYxBItkV8Fi6JMYXC01rSsffMmRUbwbEkHc4yaw06nYIb9YT/DbfUsT2IL/ BcBg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo00eAnIve8OkvPOsRp/mDChc5lYXWkBAqBV1MC7E2DzU55eUWho LZ7/LxKpzf4fyuAh6n/aR8Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR49Vb//Nrma131t5FYZi2Q3c28psceHp6QgCMnwtih0gYx9oR2scSZcR5oMcwGpsyjYeVOEzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5885:0:b0:228:28df:91af with SMTP id n5-20020a5d5885000000b0022828df91afmr3948437wrf.511.1662202194469; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t6-20020a05600c41c600b003a5ffec0b91sm4619362wmh.30.2022.09.03.03.49.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 03:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:49:52 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/72] 5.19.7-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220902121404.772492078@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220902121404.772492078@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.7 release. > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:13:47 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1758 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1761 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1763 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip