public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
	Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Subject: Re: stable-rc: 5.4: cgroup.c:2404:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpus_read_lock' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:58:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyCMdfrtgtXhCXTy@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYtro2f2u3Wug7YS7kC=iVGWsee+Vnvm4U20+xXsYVjK5w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:48:44PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On stable-rc 5.4 arm and arm64 builds failed due to following errors / warnings.
> 
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2404:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'cpus_read_lock' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>         cpus_read_lock();
>         ^
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2404:2: note: did you mean 'cpuset_read_lock'?
> include/linux/cpuset.h:58:13: note: 'cpuset_read_lock' declared here
> extern void cpuset_read_lock(void);
>             ^
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2417:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'cpus_read_unlock' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>         cpus_read_unlock();
>         ^
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2417:2: note: did you mean 'cpuset_read_unlock'?
> include/linux/cpuset.h:59:13: note: 'cpuset_read_unlock' declared here
> extern void cpuset_read_unlock(void);
>             ^
> 2 errors generated.
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:363:6: warning: misleading indentation;
> statement is not part of the previous 'if' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>          */     mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>                 ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:357:2: note: previous statement is here
>         if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
>         ^
> 1 warning generated.
> 
> Build link:
>  - https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2EfrNYbejRQczhhqndawRkHARHZ/
> 
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> -------------------
> # To install tuxmake on your system globally:
> # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake
> #
> 
> tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain clang-nightly
> --kconfig defconfig LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
> 
> Following patch might be the reason for these build errors:
> ---
> cgroup: Fix threadgroup_rwsem <-> cpus_read_lock() deadlock
> [ Upstream commit 4f7e7236435ca0abe005c674ebd6892c6e83aeb3 ]
> 
> Bringing up a CPU may involve creating and destroying tasks which requires
> read-locking threadgroup_rwsem, so threadgroup_rwsem nests inside
> cpus_read_lock(). However, cpuset's ->attach(), which may be called with
> thredagroup_rwsem write-locked, also wants to disable CPU hotplug and
> acquires cpus_read_lock(), leading to a deadlock.
> 
> Fix it by guaranteeing that ->attach() is always called with CPU hotplug
> disabled and removing cpus_read_lock() call from cpuset_attach().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> Fixes: 05c7b7a92cc8 ("cgroup/cpuset: Fix a race between
> cpuset_attach() and cpu hotplug")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.17+
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Thanks, I've added an #include that should resolve this now.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-13 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13 11:18 stable-rc: 5.4: cgroup.c:2404:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpus_read_lock' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Naresh Kamboju
2022-09-13 13:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-09-13 13:59 ` Sasha Levin
2022-09-13 14:22   ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-09-13 16:16     ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyCMdfrtgtXhCXTy@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox