From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E2DC54EE9 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229488AbiIQOEW (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:04:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229511AbiIQOEV (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:04:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656B130544; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id t14so40301870wrx.8; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:04:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+N7mSIWsME28uR3sTESoLydrgt0P7Itl5mRu1QnP8VQ=; b=q2RPxcJ5DNyh2374Z/k1HrPlnOhByW2/Y95QrAICgrQ4LpzqiMnFUcnKQpz+TQFlUc Ghd8w8X/iiqkS4cxP5lLP32oGZbm5i9EeezflwstCLnGlQ2LVGCRT2NzAuNOFcz8e1TE CsUBzf/pd5dSMEnbfuw9lTi8g9kdeBMnyedVktMUUnjehRSKzpET3MHbEAtO+3N9K2Lh Zl+pL5dgNIdYIhsejpwuXq8evTMkW6DZBAh0q3wUQDW37IIgRgsK3GZB6VqF1VNPjw4d yWT4/WvE+zmKIYVf66HvO28Vr5S1wrMJVnHbNlIzdKorWvqq11uPM+GAdTSSPl+ykxzm cEEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+N7mSIWsME28uR3sTESoLydrgt0P7Itl5mRu1QnP8VQ=; b=o7ngmw4wdCOIlIY56eSiOdmFdzlf7i9qiyZp/xvsP1DIVUNZe1Cy3awTxorCwEDcqb xVo9skRVupWsrpmgPr+/g+1Sd0NtaqMty0NLUuK3HMyLBZeS64AVXIpgDrZtqCb9K+oO hFP72kct8yN0Zc9bwGekBv4Gl9xozgighfpf0uDqHsNDNoK7UsvxBoUqsxQcsKsBO+it LkvSHdRxc9RGXaaBp4DqDBP9ME8eObeD1yJ5SBNgAcDaZD8/HyhyXHM1szR8Yr8Rjo9X xwZ9mIefVZW7tZNJIfGLqzYGpmgWYonJiwRQ+ChxWjbMd9EbXXRhWKLnhjPXoi+hZYAL i+aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1IwVMSISdWaMRdUxOXkhOq63g6QSaef1WyXC4T+eL4x6cKFz7p ouqGMMXP6XvORf+NCviORiQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7m23abd671WzVCW1eex5c8bQMB0yZBpez9SYp2iZkRGcf8BBXty6ZuWcL/i0SFISHHcalW4Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4ecd:0:b0:22a:42ec:8d74 with SMTP id s13-20020a5d4ecd000000b0022a42ec8d74mr6024826wrv.359.1663423458756; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v128-20020a1cac86000000b003b476bb2624sm6219561wme.6.2022.09.17.07.04.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:04:16 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/11] 4.19.259-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220916100442.662955946@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220916100442.662955946@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:07:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.259 release. > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1842 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip