From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8736C6FA86 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230379AbiIVKkP (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 06:40:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38398 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229802AbiIVKkO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 06:40:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32DA4BA60; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id t14so14799231wrx.8; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2g6oawi7LFkWBztbej0ETp8mqK8LEx1FGs0CZ7ZtbZU=; b=e4RYnZoEJe8mIDwxflErsiSoagXYzT4Bq++H4ATRWefhwyQrqFEB2j15O4FIX0iiyn GFNk7rg0t+BG7HJA8M99Y/fljRqxkeTNDfdJqqQe2xCvZS3oKiqtfPrDMNG1IamG+7yM GXMdGntEsuMwfuZBtq814IFQORBU8wlSOSMtFvMbVoXubFQ6MrItqLbqEj6k25Dlp5QB Fffx7qBYRkbD6/ka9k0uhIlKFvSxWs9O+EOPCAfnnRYyuMcpAxw4nWm/jMlslxSHBNeE TrocONfiu+byHe8gLr3tJHqNyPWbHdbYuBqg4dJIE62noU2hJlm0D94hHF9/bWraBWtg HUBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2g6oawi7LFkWBztbej0ETp8mqK8LEx1FGs0CZ7ZtbZU=; b=5j0EbJo6TNDQaON4Tu6CIaW0qOrK2aEYo4ChS+SIyFFwUKAdnl8RvRUHy98PtyCtm/ uClqlwhi2dvvDyg944bDtlo54/s9XESEgbt5vLdvdNeLcXUqUj0duRb6pr0AGgqLphUm 1lxmV7SjImVnms7L/4H6VnI5oac3fjRIPqnClOeAV8ZEQ6DsY7BfuUKZqBXXt6vL70Eg e0ArW/gQKeLWC8g8nbyAbvlyNYrZ1vR5d9fEu8AUpI55BFNLuJKVXInQBBSy2YcLjXMo 6S2qz8FVXP/WFXa0mTfE69Fpemme9KXc+SeKJn/K6oE5ftm9Jm7HYn1xAFGDZGzLgyPD BxVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf30QogluJrkrZ1q1Zy3jbS58EvQcwn5+uvwZBo3Er6C6QwOidNo 9f6X2mYmmaTvefMP/Uu+XFY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6GmnZvRcriGAKGHnkFGMyXho8LzOoJ5RQ1NfKmDikOfdKcCFPwLBNtLEFQSuPTqj9zzbzsww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1886:b0:22a:2944:a09 with SMTP id a6-20020a056000188600b0022a29440a09mr1599333wri.391.1663843208677; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f11-20020a05600c4e8b00b003b340f00f10sm6742198wmq.31.2022.09.22.03.40.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:40:05 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220921164741.757857192@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220921164741.757857192@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release. > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220919): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1876 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1880 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1882 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip