From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290C3C4332F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229709AbiJDLaY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:30:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36872 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229680AbiJDLaX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:30:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C893813F1F; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id w18so12119363wro.7; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=8WGNbK4B0qKTxutfrQ3EIsNMiF7ecOWgMD8vQW3LPN4=; b=CEYgHSMpmVp9cXIqQc15iUn1lEGrhZoflHTBMH7Cw1r5ccc6PkH2PSNC3BP5VGyzUt 0TzBeVj18q4PNc5llnBzwBBqgEwYvBuTu4odOjQkbmw75T5gNU+u8jAjs7UW4p3prA3j OH3xnDBsMmRKyEmWBWRp4HHFVjTHYTl49dteZemVlLXYHV5UmRsq3rmj4yqzJlwP9vMu MxKI+Pe1dfb+E3nGT6X9eIAAkGDlzge3+JAKk6hORZKIRMAI0nX2ySzcynallCFzX58z cR4TDj0RzSS8M8oKT8PhcxZfB5s5XhpnXLTw96EHNcNOBo6fK4lgbB8fwNdNXk7Rs5et Gwhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=8WGNbK4B0qKTxutfrQ3EIsNMiF7ecOWgMD8vQW3LPN4=; b=HuOB70md/dun1ryDMTOo/2x+h0oc4bXSvwRwqnFmGS0tvsCAQ7paXPv/0jCN5lmFrW Bl2eKazGG9AgbcT0q0Kcox+LO7MU51NR5YD8ZsSPk3G5yHg/HiRbxWKPAtoREfBBh7An 1rRRhyNxOsgd4arstFX/hQwQhLdGf62+iYzxGdTzstT6rKcaQhSAJPIGV7msGv1ra/Al NtEmzqQJrYfWLPeqYEjlYMnNSfisBpgqdBdKLE1KmG8FidL8HRjTizVYZvNv/uHo4mNO 6kfzgMcnUv5gdqK6ygkNSx82iCYbmi8vgUy/rQLFwv99O70CSPYvgyWClL46smFq8Fvt hT/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2GMv0m0zqMM+tu0H5Y8KNueVqmGiAzqzlWJXGivHjrJpuynoQa wdaLMin/PmWAs3kPnWWQc1ONv9witz8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4RTZYu7lJnRqNFX9kpgONVGs68WX98inEE/KLJeZhvVPmlM+Hvj3CS/aSmTVVIkni6PUm3WA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:70e:b0:22a:c7f5:c5f7 with SMTP id bs14-20020a056000070e00b0022ac7f5c5f7mr15992440wrb.333.1664883021402; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u15-20020a05600c19cf00b003a2f2bb72d5sm26089123wmq.45.2022.10.04.04.30.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:30:19 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/30] 5.4.216-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221003070716.269502440@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221003070716.269502440@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.216 release. > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1944 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip