From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A986DC433FE for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229500AbiJDRqF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 13:46:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57280 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229549AbiJDRqD (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 13:46:03 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F414AD4B; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37635B81B41; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B327C433D6; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:45:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1664905558; bh=mEuhiXpELJARb7beXplRVX/+gd88BFbLzWSWad5oX8o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eDoUJN3Dk4zk4dFGhDVajXkCiOsVyfOlFNLKutOqnS0yZPN7S2hiRD/8aZFg57Dv1 pRzqnuTzSdvB5UnX9mZzlZJGsUyExJtBKbdsMMeKPXawisnLKquKXqUFghZyNYQwgU DhEl72pDN/A+LsCppq7Jhy3uJGa0tnP/zbFXq55o= Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:45:56 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221003070721.971297651@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:26:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/3/22 00:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release. > > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > perf fails to build. > > In file included from util/evlist.h:13, > from builtin-annotate.c:21: > util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’? > 266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX]; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | PERF_TXN_MAX > In file included from util/hist.h:8, > from builtin-diff.c:13: > util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’? > 266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX]; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | PERF_TXN_MAX > In file included from util/evlist.h:13, > from builtin-evlist.c:11: > util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’? > 266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX]; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | PERF_TXN_MAX > In file included from tools/perf/util/evlist.h:13, > from builtin-ftrace.c:24: > tools/perf/util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’? > 266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX]; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | PERF_TXN_MAX > builtin-annotate.c: In function ‘cmd_annotate’: > builtin-annotate.c:594:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘symbol__validate_sym_arguments’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 594 | ret = symbol__validate_sym_arguments(); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks, I've dropped all perf patches from the 5.15 queue right now as they seem to have been added incorrectly. That being said, I can't build perf for 5.15.y now anyway, so something older must have broken my system, glad it's building for you... thanks greg k-h