From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067411DE899; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734096385; cv=none; b=IpgSn7R/e7rdc6TJW77RKFgcvMN2vDS8lyXShgNZzr17FGNDrMI9VB9mTarrtv4Jk5qZlC7NbU9h+Jw6frtFYpliS+3CsCGMaF79+VrCzSSkWYU8ww/zol0JQggAMCa8fSAdu5Ms37ZtFgApbnD5Jeo1Gk191PbI5HG8RkUJImk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734096385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pq5E2dClTb3b+TgYz6BmlZ0VaMkh6Yol45ssZt5Flt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LXp6zq3VELdmsbKizQaAswCtfP9lPQSE6YgF8AlJXiQQ5z2NWg3meKgCxtcuhGCVU5HLPliXQRCAGX9yx1bQ6phr5SdmPt6GJAXZwb7anoGSV6ffLaFn6EEzhzYieyuGWMleu7RdhIlEXywMG0e450EbWQZUIIEuVzsy1JXOIYA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=JZ8v4Iel; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="JZ8v4Iel" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D128D14C1E1; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:26:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1734096373; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NSxcARGH8lpnoYOuXPDZNEAu2lX0pFm+l+w1f6zH2n4=; b=JZ8v4IelH/Ih0MvPgds5TamtYsW4tuOjGVUKqjzNX0NvFryQnnvYnPqNXgqXkz8Ls+peaC xq4kQ1ANqkpD971fgwU2HW5G/Yj2PzFNcJmkrTAIuLZIQsBqhwis9ooow+/MlYUpY8X0ZR ZutvF0q/oJ+fiHSPb54b/n8O0ys1rFhAyr6gTJN+oZLKVgNGyfmR46mTYUi2YH8tIX5LXg tsbgJsVE2lgVbfHRMZMnquejLAKEz7hqerHVqsZ8fdmCT8vricNMv5Ka31fvilq0dQN87G kRHy9AUpJdm7xNxgudZDqm4Yse8OjXeXjD2Aenhjs9yC8itpMrbVVqjFMAb/5A== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a0c62334; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:25:52 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/459] 5.10.231-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20241212144253.511169641@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241212144253.511169641@linuxfoundation.org> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:55:38PM +0100: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.231 release. > There are 459 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:41:35 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.231-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Tested 2146a7485c27 ("Linux 5.10.231-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet > Shengjiu Wang > ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix the naming style for mask definition > > Shengjiu Wang > ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage > > Sascha Hauer > ASoC: fsl_micfil: use GENMASK to define register bit fields > > Sascha Hauer > ASoC: fsl_micfil: do not define SHIFT/MASK for single bits > > Sascha Hauer > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read Just a note on these, our version (from nxp) of this was full of conflicts and too much effort to merge for something I cannot test easily, so I squashed out this part and re-cherry-picked just commits c808e277bcdf ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read") and 06df673d2023 ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage") The other three commits are marked as a stable dep of 06df673d2023 but it really is trivial to backport and not worth the risk to me; if you'd like me to send the minimal backport I used I'll be happy to. (but, as far as I'm concerned I'm fine as is as well and consider this closed; just reporting I didn't test this 100% as is. Not that my automated test actually exercises the micfil code anyway...) Thanks, -- Dominique Martinet