From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A2621A424 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736438499; cv=none; b=aFCHCWm7SI90fwJmI92lfh/DOGFdbhw2M4tJQLhNmoxI0DVvewUjmaCbB4MfXcx+OBLGSQFU7X7VndscnTwud/1GXauuPqBfkqyvbtkUdEHN5RP+/pfC3AwShY6m4QVGaJsoQmi2SnGev8IgUDfjXl5S0PP2FS3pN14WqFPHtfs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736438499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9oP27jereGLgY5eBvy/AnuERETJGryU0Pe9YulYtEQE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=neKdXw9I8K4X0tJ3utGq3hg+yt7R6b9T7ZL45xrCBjUMiC204AwAYVdk8ejjN/jSQIh/LkkRBj7xzbjPXcs+QgkK9qBYvavhtfKEpibxgbG+szib+EezBLOa4AqGyFKN6hmax3FPRYETGBBtGlIh9wv/o7I41r0zo++eDcmURgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=pStXPF4o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pStXPF4o" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=vr+rmLFcUT53V/TKaw+JbeKZ1qrqIgHBpwiHSZZ8pkk=; b=pStXPF4on95mBvYRvvaA0CVmqY cS8c5GWmcdiclB2+ixh1/9tOT91UWKXQ7Xq0yv5VrOVXSzWUt5yvAJsro/XVzsa/miXmfT/08l4a7 z7vENabAaYyJ/7LXPv7EIquq78JNzEwiQ0yt+g8nrD7jYKHHPW0aulH8MmqG7acN38KWgtruWBsFo CBuzALNPleYZuyw3z8ByNsv68+9N6TYMA3xinEUKjIptG7zhEVXGvP6tMyz0b+0VP+ZDt2m7Ddacs k1gfS7umonNnHu9Qq63uizYrgiuJWYrB0x2/PgEkQLurfj/zZIL/zjLlYleS0kRmD7dPMbpsq3z49 QZkpECow==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tVuyR-00000006taM-3HvN; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:01:31 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:01:31 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, balbirs@nvidia.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hch@lst.de, mhocko@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vmalloc: fix accounting with i915" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Message-ID: References: <2024122301-uncommon-enquirer-5f71@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 08:20:43PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 11:18:01AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to . > > The 5.15 patch also applies to the 5.10-stable tree. Thanks, Seems to have been missed? The 5.15 patch made it into 5.15.176 but the 5.10 patch isn't in 5.10.233 released the same day.