From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: sumit.garg@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
elder@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] fix reference leak in locomo_init_one_child()
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:28:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3p6-LeZZ2ZGupEc@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250105111156.277058-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn>
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 07:11:56PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> Once device_register() failed, we should call put_device() to
> decrement reference count for cleanup. Or it could cause memory leak.
>
> device_register() includes device_add(). As comment of device_add()
> says, 'if device_add() succeeds, you should call device_del() when you
> want to get rid of it. If device_add() has not succeeded, use only
> put_device() to drop the reference count'.
The commit message is not quite correct:
"After calling device_register(), the correct way to dispose of the
device is to call put_device() as per the device_register()
documentation rather than kfree()."
This reveals that your patch is not completely correct.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> index cb6ef449b987..7274010218ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ locomo_init_one_child(struct locomo *lchip, struct locomo_dev_info *info)
>
> ret = device_register(&dev->dev);
> if (ret) {
> + put_device(&dev->dev);
> out:
> kfree(dev);
... and that leads to the second problem here - this kfree() will lead
to a double-free of the device. Once by the reference count dropping to
zero, resulting in locomo_dev_release() being called, and then this
kfree().
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-05 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-05 11:11 [PATCH] [ARM] fix reference leak in locomo_init_one_child() Ma Ke
2025-01-05 12:28 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3p6-LeZZ2ZGupEc@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox