From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D7286333; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 05:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736228938; cv=none; b=DWofn3zI983hO3ZyXMwGJN5tkDBDOgFi+CWAyMB65dgxppKSLJI83Azu2RoBrAhPEJmK6NpHyqRRYNFAa/YkFEOZlhJv1/4dreR7EOzTMuO76NHb1Ck6zqQdc4sGU4J89vZEEQJIXGwUIBSGy3B21dCgqpksHQDUpojS6AzgFXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736228938; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2D7nJT1s57AhZd7bnAtWkJG0G1NWlqxlRKh9pHXVAKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RMI3ZUndnSJlBqG4DFSO9sZBZsgvAJlc6MQMPT/ZlzXvXWonRzy9XxDkHrZfMmQhb87zBJSuPb43oFCiSlO1PIDolBNj4FIJkJv/1d3YXNhkz3DXAhc7z2kPn7qsRgeVttNfw06CBzyN02GkgCqbAo/Dk7MHo1IjBf6FwV3waLw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=2EH3mTb4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="2EH3mTb4" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7893614C1E1; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 06:48:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1736228931; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6RhY/zDwnLzW59KAqK0wY5bVr7f0LYhNiClT9bjt9lU=; b=2EH3mTb4E/UVrZI+oT3jnAlLgpCTDY/4/oE1SCKdzk6i0mOl2l8oSLpjnRwq9AYJFkh2xc Jbg3AG901JhDUiR3x9NnfvXAnGz0AZMObPC3+hSsspCvVzvCakFGw3QH2EsN5oT/WY4bz2 yAv+zv36YXJPD5yf2Xed4vYtF/XQAoX490vEIRpvTG54kcxFE2ocnM3FBCxBls3H70fPsu uaajxfaWxLmpJE8t4pXXT7NsbgFFNbZm8GoyyCbp8Lvx31THLItRjcn5FCTb48IYCz4CYv Nc0juzf0WeFO1tc1RZY1RkcA9/fOVs+U4aTvBalLd3Lb6tFKTDjnFA1YuPKPYg== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 7901807a; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 05:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:48:29 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/138] 5.10.233-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20250106151133.209718681@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250106151133.209718681@linuxfoundation.org> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 04:15:24PM +0100: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.233 release. > There are 138 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.233-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Didn't run into any issue other than the zram problem reported in reply to the patch itself. Tested e0db650ec963 ("Linux 5.10.233-rc1") + revert of bc2472d78aec256d ("zram: fix uninitialized ZRAM not releasing backing device") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet -- Dominique Martinet