From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
konradybcio@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Saranya R <quic_sarar@quicinc.com>,
Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:59:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6x_GJg92ddzoRwQ@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6xr3ylNSC6iYf-C@hovoldconsulting.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:37:11PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:43:23AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > A Link tag to my report would be good to have as well if this fixes the
> > > audio regression.
> >
> > I see this is somehow matching the logs you have reported, but this deadlock
> > is there from the very first day of pdr_interface driver.
> >
> > [ 14.565059] PDR: avs/audio get domain list txn wait failed: -110
> > [ 14.571943] PDR: service lookup for avs/audio failed: -110
>
> Yes, but using the in-kernel pd-mapper has exposed a number of existing
> bugs since it changes the timing of events enough to make it easier to
> hit them.
>
> The audio regression is a very real regression for users of Snapdragon
> based laptops like, for example, the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x.
>
> If Bjorn has confirmed that this is the same issue (I can try to
> instrument the code based on your analysis to confirm this too), then I
> think it would be good to mention this in the commit message and link to
> the report, for example:
>
> This specifically also fixes an audio regression when using the
> in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. [1]
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zqet8iInnDhnxkT9@hovoldconsulting.com/ # [1]
>
> or similar.
I can confirm that audio regression with the in-kernel pd-mapper appears
to be caused by the race that this patch fixes.
If I insert a short (100-200 ms) sleep before taking the list lock in
pdr_locator_new_server() to increase the race window, I see the audio
service failing to register on both the X1E CRD and Lenovo ThinkPad
X13s:
[ 11.118557] pdr_add_lookup - tms/servreg / msm/adsp/charger_pd
[ 11.443632] pdr_locator_new_server
[ 11.558122] pdr_locator_new_server - taking list lock
[ 11.563939] pdr_locator_new_server - releasing list lock
[ 11.582178] pdr_locator_work - taking list lock
[ 11.594468] pdr_locator_work - releasing list lock
[ 11.992018] pdr_add_lookup - avs/audio / msm/adsp/audio_pd
[ 11.992034] pdr_add_lookup - avs/audio / msm/adsp/audio_pd
[ 11.992224] pdr_locator_new_server
< 100 ms sleep inserted before taking lock in pdr_locator_new_server() >
[ 11.997937] pdr_locator_work - taking list lock
[ 12.093984] pdr_locator_new_server - taking list lock
[ 17.120169] PDR: avs/audio get domain list txn wait failed: -110
[ 17.127066] PDR: service lookup for avs/audio failed: -110
[ 17.132893] pdr_locator_work - releasing list lock
[ 17.139885] pdr_locator_new_server - releasing list lock
[ On the X13s, where I have not hit this issue with the in-kernel
pd-mapper, I had to make sure to insert the sleep only on the second
call, possibly because of interaction with the charger_pd registration
which happened closer to the audio registration. ]
Please add a comment and link to the audio regression report as I
suggested above, and feel free to include my:
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Thanks for fixing this!
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-12 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 15:55 [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock Mukesh Ojha
2025-02-06 22:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-02-10 9:20 ` Mukesh Ojha
2025-02-10 9:43 ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-11 17:07 ` Mukesh Ojha
2025-02-12 9:37 ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-12 10:59 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-02-12 16:13 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6x_GJg92ddzoRwQ@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_sarar@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox