From: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix uninitialised access in mii_nway_restart()
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:19:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7R6uet1dJ1UJsJ1@qasdev.system> (raw)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:10:08AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:24:43AM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> > In mii_nway_restart() during the line:
> >
> > bmcr = mii->mdio_read(mii->dev, mii->phy_id, MII_BMCR);
> >
> > The code attempts to call mii->mdio_read which is ch9200_mdio_read().
> >
> > ch9200_mdio_read() utilises a local buffer, which is initialised
> > with control_read():
> >
> > unsigned char buff[2];
> >
> > However buff is conditionally initialised inside control_read():
> >
> > if (err == size) {
> > memcpy(data, buf, size);
> > }
> >
> > If the condition of "err == size" is not met, then buff remains
> > uninitialised. Once this happens the uninitialised buff is accessed
> > and returned during ch9200_mdio_read():
> >
> > return (buff[0] | buff[1] << 8);
> >
> > The problem stems from the fact that ch9200_mdio_read() ignores the
> > return value of control_read(), leading to uinit-access of buff.
> >
> > To fix this we should check the return value of control_read()
> > and return early on error.
>
> What about get_mac_address()?
>
> If you find a bug, it is a good idea to look around and see if there
> are any more instances of the same bug. I could be wrong, but it seems
> like get_mac_address() suffers from the same problem?
Thank you for the feedback Andrew. I checked get_mac_address() before
sending this patch and to me it looks like it does check the return value of
control_read(). It accumulates the return value of each control_read() call into
rd_mac_len and then checks if it not equal to what is expected (ETH_ALEN which is 6),
I believe each call should return 2.
>
> Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 12:19 Qasim Ijaz [this message]
2025-02-26 13:43 ` [PATCH] net: fix uninitialised access in mii_nway_restart() Andrew Lunn
2025-03-07 17:55 ` Qasim Ijaz
2025-03-07 17:56 ` Andrew Lunn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-27 23:15 Qasim Ijaz
2025-02-26 11:27 Qasim Ijaz
2025-02-18 0:24 Qasim Ijaz
2025-02-18 1:10 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7R6uet1dJ1UJsJ1@qasdev.system \
--to=qasdev00@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=cf0d2929-d854-48ce-97eb-69747f0833f2@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).