From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Kostadin Shishmanov <kostadinshishmanov@protonmail.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] A couple of build fixes for x86 when using GCC 15
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:51:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7nIbng2JHSg9in_@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202501300804.20D8CC2@keescook>
* Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:11:32PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > GCC 15 changed the default C standard version from gnu17 to gnu23, which
> > reveals a few places in the kernel where a C standard version was not
> > set, resulting in build failures because bool, true, and false are
> > reserved keywords in C23 [1][2]. Update these places to use the same C
> > standard version as the rest of the kernel, gnu11.
>
> Hello x86 maintainers!
>
> I think this would be valuable to get into -rc1 since we're getting very
> close to a GCC 15 release. Can someone get this into -tip urgent,
> please? If everyone is busy I can take it via the hardening tree, as we
> appear to be the ones tripping over it the most currently. :)
Just an update, the x86 fix is now upstream via:
ee2ab467bddf ("x86/boot: Use '-std=gnu11' to fix build with GCC 15")
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-22 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 1:11 [PATCH 0/2] A couple of build fixes for x86 when using GCC 15 Nathan Chancellor
2025-01-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot: Use '-std=gnu11' to fix build with " Nathan Chancellor
2025-01-29 8:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-01-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: libstub: " Nathan Chancellor
2025-01-22 11:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-01-30 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] A couple of build fixes for x86 when using " Kees Cook
2025-01-30 16:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-01-30 18:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-22 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7nIbng2JHSg9in_@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kostadinshishmanov@protonmail.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox