From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@leemhuis.info>
Subject: Re: Please apply commit 06e472acf964 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Remove usage of dma_get_required_mask() API") to stable series
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:45:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAmqt45uu1YoEnaD@eldamar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1wn3rgj7a.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 02:05:01PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Salvatore,
>
> > So I believe the right thing would be to revert first in the stable
> > series where it was applied (5.10.y, 5.15.y) the commit e0e0747de0ea
> > ("scsi: mpt3sas: Fix return value check of dma_get_required_mask()")
> > and then on top of this revert apply the patches:
> >
> > 9df650963bf6 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Don't change DMA mask while reallocating pools")
> > 1a2dcbdde82e ("scsi: mpt3sas: re-do lost mpt3sas DMA mask fix")
> > 06e472acf964 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Remove usage of dma_get_required_mask() API")
> >
> > Attached mbox file implements this.
> >
> > Does that looks now good for resolving the regression?
>
> Yes, that's one way to resolve it.
>
> At a quick glance your mbox looks fine. Best way to validate would be to
> compare the resulting _base_config_dma_addressing() function between
> your tree and upstream. I don't believe we have had additional changes
> here so there should be no delta.
Yes, the resulting _base_config_dma_addressing() function is the same
after applying the series of commits.
In both cases it will be:
/**
* _base_config_dma_addressing - set dma addressing
* @ioc: per adapter object
* @pdev: PCI device struct
*
* Return: 0 for success, non-zero for failure.
*/
static int
_base_config_dma_addressing(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct sysinfo s;
u64 coherent_dma_mask, dma_mask;
if (ioc->is_mcpu_endpoint || sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 4) {
ioc->dma_mask = 32;
coherent_dma_mask = dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
/* Set 63 bit DMA mask for all SAS3 and SAS35 controllers */
} else if (ioc->hba_mpi_version_belonged > MPI2_VERSION) {
ioc->dma_mask = 63;
coherent_dma_mask = dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(63);
} else {
ioc->dma_mask = 64;
coherent_dma_mask = dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
}
if (ioc->use_32bit_dma)
coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
if (dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, dma_mask) ||
dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, coherent_dma_mask))
return -ENODEV;
if (ioc->dma_mask > 32) {
ioc->base_add_sg_single = &_base_add_sg_single_64;
ioc->sge_size = sizeof(Mpi2SGESimple64_t);
} else {
ioc->base_add_sg_single = &_base_add_sg_single_32;
ioc->sge_size = sizeof(Mpi2SGESimple32_t);
}
si_meminfo(&s);
ioc_info(ioc, "%d BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED, total mem (%ld kB)\n",
ioc->dma_mask, convert_to_kb(s.totalram));
return 0;
}
Regards,
Salvatore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-04 9:52 Please apply commit 06e472acf964 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Remove usage of dma_get_required_mask() API") to stable series Salvatore Bonaccorso
2023-03-06 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-06 20:53 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2023-03-07 1:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-03-08 16:32 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2023-03-08 18:06 ` Martin Wilck
2023-03-08 19:33 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2023-03-10 12:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-08 19:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-03-09 9:45 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso [this message]
2023-03-09 15:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZAmqt45uu1YoEnaD@eldamar.lan \
--to=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox